Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Candesartan on Cause-Specific Mortality in Heart Failure Patients: The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program

Solomon, Scott D., Wang, Duolao, Finn, Peter, Skali, Hicham, Zornoff, Leonardo, McMurray, John J.V., Swedberg, Karl, Yusuf, Salim, Granger, Christopher B., Michelson, Eric L., Pocock, Stuart, Pfeffer, Marc A.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Patients with heart failure are at increased risk of sudden death and death attributed to progressive pump failure. We assessed the effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in patients enrolled in the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. Methods and Results— The CHARM program consisted of 3 component trials that enrolled patients with symptomatic heart failure: CHARM-Alternative (n=2028; LVEF⩽40% and ACE intolerant), CHARM-Added (n=2548; LVEF⩽40%, already on ACE inhibitors), and CHARM-Preserved (n=3023; LVEF >40%). Patients were randomized to candesartan, titrated to 32 mg QD, or placebo and were followed up for a median of 37.7 months. All deaths were reviewed by a blinded adjudication committee and categorized according to prespecified definitions on the basis of a narrative and source documentation. The number and rate of deaths by cause were calculated for each of the component trials and the overall program. Of all the patients, 8.5% died suddenly, and 6.2% died of progressive heart failure. Candesartan reduced both sudden death (HR 0.85 [0.73 to 0.99], P =0.036) and death from worsening heart failure (HR 0.78 [0.65 to 0.94], P =0.008). These reductions were most apparent in the patients with LVEF⩽40%. Conclusions— Candesartan reduced sudden death and death from worsening heart failure in patients with symptomatic heart failure, although this reduction was most apparent in patients with systolic dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000144474.65922.aa

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Solomon, S. D., Wang, D., Finn, P., Skali, H., Zornoff, L., McMurray, J. J. V., Swedberg, K., Yusuf, S., Granger, C. B., Michelson, E. L., Pocock, S., & Pfeffer, M. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-10-12
Volume
110
Issue
15
Pages
2180-2183
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2109051856
Cited by
266
References
5
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Candesartan on Cause-Specific Mortality in Heart Failure Patients: The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000144474.65922.aa
The paper
Solomon, S. D., Wang, D., Finn, P., Skali, H., Zornoff, L., McMurray, J. J. V., Swedberg, K., Yusuf, S., Granger, C. B., Michelson, E. L., Pocock, S., & Pfeffer, M. A. (2004). Effect of Candesartan on Cause-Specific Mortality in Heart Failure Patients: The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000144474.65922.aa

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.