Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cystatin C: A Novel Predictor of Outcome in Suspected or Confirmed Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Jernberg, Tomas, Lindahl, Bertil, James, Stefan, Larsson, Anders, Hansson, Lars-Olof, Wallentin, Lars·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Patients with suspected or confirmed non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) constitute a large and heterogeneous group. Measurements of renal function such as serum creatinine and estimation of creatinine clearance carry independent prognostic information in this population. Cystatin C is a new and better marker of renal function than creatinine. The aim was therefore to evaluate the prognostic value of cystatin C in this population. Methods and Results— Cystatin C was analyzed on admission in 726 patients admitted because of symptoms suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome and no ST-segment elevations. Patients were followed up with regard to death and myocardial infarction for a median of 40 and 6 months, respectively. The median cystatin C level was 1.00 mg/L (25th to 75th percentile, 0.83 to 1.24 mg/L). The risk of death during follow-up increased with increasing levels of cystatin C. In the group with non–ST-elevation ACS, patients in the second, third, and fourth quartiles had a relative risk of subsequent death of 1.8 (95% CI, 0.6 to 5.3), 3.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to 8.5), and 11.7 (95% CI, 4.7 to 29.3) compared with the lowest quartile. In Cox regression models including well-known predictors of outcome, cystatin C level was independently associated with mortality but not with the risk of subsequent myocardial infarction. In a comparison of the markers of renal function in receiver-operating curve analyses, cystatin C had the best ability to discriminate between survivors and nonsurvivors. Conclusions— A single measurement of cystatin C will substantially improve the early risk stratification of patients with suspected or confirmed non–ST-elevation ACS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000145166.44942.e0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Jernberg, T., Lindahl, B., James, S., Larsson, A., Hansson, L.-O., & Wallentin, L.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-10-19
Volume
110
Issue
16
Pages
2342-2348
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2015650402
Cited by
255
References
0
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cystatin C: A Novel Predictor of Outcome in Suspected or Confirmed Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000145166.44942.e0
The paper
Jernberg, T., Lindahl, B., James, S., Larsson, A., Hansson, L.-O., & Wallentin, L. (2004). Cystatin C: A Novel Predictor of Outcome in Suspected or Confirmed Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000145166.44942.e0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.