Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 692

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spotty Calcification Typifies the Culprit Plaque in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Open access
Ehara, Shoichi, Kobayashi, Yoshiki, Yoshiyama, Minoru, Shimada, Kenei, Shimada, Yoshihisa, Fukuda, Daiju, Nakamura, Yasuhiro, Yamashita, Hajime, Yamagishi, Hiroyuki, Takeuchi, Kazuhide, Naruko, Takahiko, Haze, Kazuo, Becker, Anton E., Yoshikawa, Junichi, Ueda, Makiko·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Calcification is a common finding in human coronary arteries; however, the relationship between calcification patterns, plaque morphology, and patterns of remodeling of culprit lesions in a comparison of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and those with stable conditions has not been documented. Methods and Results— Preinterventional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of 178 patients were studied, 61 with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 70 with unstable angina pectoris (UAP), and 47 with stable angina pectoris (SAP). The frequency of calcium deposits within an arc of less than 90° for all calcium deposits was significantly different in culprit lesions of patients with AMI, UAP, and SAP ( P <0.0001). Moreover, the average number of calcium deposits within an arc of <90° per patient was significantly higher in AMI than in SAP ( P <0.0005; mean±SD, AMI 1.4±1.3, SAP 0.5±0.8). Conversely, calcium deposits were significantly longer in SAP patients ( P <0.0001; mean±SD, AMI 2.2±1.6, UAP 1.9±1.8, and SAP 4.3±3.2 mm). In AMI patients, the typical pattern was spotty calcification, associated with a fibrofatty plaque and positive remodeling. In ACS patients showing negative remodeling, no calcification was the most frequent observation. Conversely, SAP patients had the highest frequency of extensive calcification. Conclusions— Our observations show that IVUS allows the identification of vulnerable plaques in coronary arteries, not only by identifying a fibrofatty plaque and positive remodeling, but also by identifying a spotty pattern of calcification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000148131.41425.e9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 692

Metadata

Authors
Ehara, S., Kobayashi, Y., Yoshiyama, M., Shimada, K., Shimada, Y., Fukuda, D., Nakamura, Y., Yamashita, H., Yamagishi, H., Takeuchi, K., Naruko, T., Haze, K., Becker, A. E., Yoshikawa, J., & Ueda, M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-11-30
Volume
110
Issue
22
Pages
3424-3429
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2140385719
Cited by
692
References
0
FWCI
17.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spotty Calcification Typifies the Culprit Plaque in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000148131.41425.e9
The paper
Ehara, S., Kobayashi, Y., Yoshiyama, M., Shimada, K., Shimada, Y., Fukuda, D., Nakamura, Y., Yamashita, H., Yamagishi, H., Takeuchi, K., Naruko, T., Haze, K., Becker, A. E., Yoshikawa, J., & Ueda, M. (2004). Spotty Calcification Typifies the Culprit Plaque in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000148131.41425.e9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.