Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 793

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovered Pulmonary Vein Conduction as a Dominant Factor for Recurrent Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After Complete Circular Isolation of the Pulmonary Veins: Lessons From Double Lasso Technique

Ouyang, Feifan, Antz, Matthias, Ernst, Sabine, Hachiya, Hitoshi, Mavrakis, Hercules, Deger, Florian T., Schaumann, Anselm, Chun, Julian, Falk, Peter, Hennig, Detlef, Liu, Xingpeng, Bänsch, Dietmar, Kuck, Karl-Heinz·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATa) can recur after continuous circular lesions (CCLs) around the ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PVs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study characterizes the electrophysiological findings in patients with and without ATa after complete PV isolation. Methods and Results— Twenty-nine of 100 patients had recurrent ATa after complete PV isolation by use of CCLs during a mean follow-up of ≈8 months. A repeat procedure was performed in 26 patients with ATa and in 7 volunteers without ATa at 3 to 4 months after CCLs. No recovered PV conduction was demonstrated in the 7 volunteers, whereas recovered PV conduction was found in 21 patients with recurrent ATa (right-sided PVs in 9 patients and left-sided PVs in 16 patients). The interval from the onset of the P wave to the earliest PV spike was 157±66 ms in the right-sided PVs and 149±45 ms in the left-sided PVs. During the procedure, PV tachycardia activated the atrium and resulted in atrial tachycardia (AT) in 10 patients. All conduction gaps were successfully closed with segmental RF ablation. After PV isolation, macroreentrant AT was induced and ablated in 3 patients. In the 5 patients without PV conduction, focal AT in the left atrial roof in 2 patients and non-PV foci in the left atrium in 1 patient were successfully abolished; in the remaining 2 patients, no ablation was performed because of noninducible arrhythmias. During a mean follow-up of ≈6 months, 24 patients were free of ATa without antiarrhythmic drugs. Conclusions— In patients with recurrent ATa after CCLs, recovered PV conduction is a dominant finding in ≈80% of patients and can be successfully eliminated by segmental RF ablation. Also, mapping and ablation of non-PV arrhythmias can improve clinical success.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000151289.73085.36

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 793

Metadata

Authors
Ouyang, F., Antz, M., Ernst, S., Hachiya, H., Mavrakis, H., Deger, F. T., Schaumann, A., Chun, J., Falk, P., Hennig, D., Liu, X., Bänsch, D., & Kuck, K.-H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-01-18
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
127-135
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2141561503
Cited by
793
References
1
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovered Pulmonary Vein Conduction as a Dominant Factor for Recurrent Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After Complete Circular Isolation of the Pulmonary Veins: Lessons From Double Lasso Technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000151289.73085.36
The paper
Ouyang, F., Antz, M., Ernst, S., Hachiya, H., Mavrakis, H., Deger, F. T., Schaumann, A., Chun, J., Falk, P., Hennig, D., Liu, X., Bänsch, D., & Kuck, K.-H. (2005). Recovered Pulmonary Vein Conduction as a Dominant Factor for Recurrent Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After Complete Circular Isolation of the Pulmonary Veins: Lessons From Double Lasso Technique. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000151289.73085.36

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.