The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incremental Prognostic Value of Post-Stress Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Volume by Gated Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
Open accessAbstract
Background —The incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and volume over perfusion has not been investigated. Methods and Results —We identified 1680 consecutive patients who underwent rest Tl-201/stress Tc-99m sestamibi gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and who were followed-up for 569±106 days. Receiver-operator characteristics analysis defined an EF<45%, an end-systolic volume (ESV) >70 mL, and an end-diastolic volume >120 mL as optimal thresholds, yielding moderate sensitivity and high specificity in the prediction of cardiac death. Patients with an EF≥45% had mortality rates <1%/year, despite severe perfusion abnormalities, whereas patients with an EF<45% had high mortality rates, even with only mild/moderate perfusion abnormalities (9.2%/year; P <0.00001). Similarly, an ESV≤70 mL was related to a low cardiac death rate (<1.2%/year), even for patients with severe perfusion abnormalities, whereas patients with an ESV>70 mL and only mild/moderate perfusion abnormalities had high death rates (8.2%/year; P <0.00001). Patients with an EF<45% and an ESV≤70 mL had low cardiac death rates (1.7%/year); those with an EF<45% but an ESV>70 mL had high death rates (7.9%/year; P <0.02). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that perfusion variables and ESV were independent predictors of overall coronary events, whereas EF and ESV demonstrated incremental prognostic values over prescan and perfusion information in predicting cardiac death and cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Conclusions —Post-stress EF and ESV by gated-SPECT have incremental prognostic values over prescan and perfusion information in predicting cardiac death, and they provide clinically useful risk stratification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fihn, S. D., Gardin, J. M., Abrams, J., Berra, K., Blankenship, J. C., Dallas, A. P., Douglas, P. S., Foody, J. M., Gerber, T. C., Hinderliter, A. L., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318277d6a0 · Cited by 845
Sabharwal, N. K., & Lahiri, A. (2003) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heart.89.11.1291 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharir, T., Germano, G., Kavanagh, P. B., Lai, S., Cohen, I., Lewin, H. C., Friedman, J. D., Zellweger, M. J., & Berman, D. S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-09-07
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1035-1042
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2118151318
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.