Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Major Racial Differences in Coronary Constrictor Response Between Japanese and Caucasians With Recent Myocardial Infarction

Pristipino, Christian, Beltrame, John F., Finocchiaro, Maria L., Hattori, Ryuichi, Fujita, Masatoshi, Mongiardo, Rocco, Cianflone, Domenico, Sanna, Tommaso, Sasayama, Shigetake, Maseri, Attilio·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Enhanced coronary vasomotion may contribute to acute coronary occlusion during the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI). Japanese have a higher incidence of variant angina than Caucasian patients, but racial differences in vasomotor reactivity early after AMI are controversial. Methods and Results —The same team studied 15 Japanese and 19 Caucasian patients within 14 days of AMI by acetylcholine injection into non–infarct-related (NIRA) and infarct-related (IRA) coronary arteries followed by nitroglycerin. Incidence of vasodilation, vasoconstriction, spasm, and basal tone were assessed in proximal, middle, and distal segments after each drug bolus by quantitative angiography. Japanese patients had much lower cholesterol levels than Caucasians (183±59 versus 247±53 mg/dL, P <0.006) but showed a lower incidence of vasodilation (2% versus 9% of coronary segments) and a greater incidence of spasm after acetylcholine (47% versus 15% of arteries, P <0.00001). Incidence of spasm was higher in IRAs than in NIRAs in both populations (67% versus 39% and 23% versus 11%, respectively). Multivessel spasm was more common (64% versus 17%, P <0.02) and vasoconstriction of nonspastic segments was greater in Japanese patients (−23.4±14.9% versus −20.1±15.7%, P <0.02) in the presence of similar average basal coronary tone with respect to post–nitroglycerin dilation and of nonsignificant differences of coronary atherosclerotic score. Conclusions —Soon after AMI, Japanese patients exhibited a 3-fold-greater incidence of spasm and greater vasoconstriction of nonspastic segments after acetylcholine than Caucasians. The causes of such differences warrant further investigation because they may have relevant pathophysiological and therapeutic implications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.101.10.1102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 383

Metadata

Authors
Pristipino, C., Beltrame, J. F., Finocchiaro, M. L., Hattori, R., Fujita, M., Mongiardo, R., Cianflone, D., Sanna, T., Sasayama, S., & Maseri, A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-03-14
Volume
101
Issue
10
Pages
1102-1108
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2066805529
Cited by
383
References
1
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Major Racial Differences in Coronary Constrictor Response Between Japanese and Caucasians With Recent Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.10.1102
The paper
Pristipino, C., Beltrame, J. F., Finocchiaro, M. L., Hattori, R., Fujita, M., Mongiardo, R., Cianflone, D., Sanna, T., Sasayama, S., & Maseri, A. (2000). Major Racial Differences in Coronary Constrictor Response Between Japanese and Caucasians With Recent Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.10.1102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.