The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrophysiological End Point for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Initiated From Multiple Pulmonary Venous Foci
Abstract
Background —The end point for catheter ablation of pulmonary vein (PV) foci initiating atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been determined. Methods and Results —Ninety patients underwent mapping during spontaneous or induced ectopy and/or AF initiation. Ostial PV ablation was performed by use of angiograms to precisely define targeted sites. Success defined by elimination of AF without drugs was correlated with the procedural end point of the abolition of distal PV potentials. A total of 197 arrhythmogenic PV foci (97%)—single in 31% and multiple in 69%—and 6 atrial foci were identified. A discrete radiofrequency (RF) application eliminated the PV potentials in 9 PV foci, whereas 2 foci from the same PV required RF applications at separate sites in 19 cases. In others, a wider region was targeted with progressive elimination of ectopy. In 49 patients, multiple sessions were necessary owing to recurrent or new ectopy. The clinical success rates were 93%, 73%, and 55% in patients with 1, 2, and ≥3 arrhythmogenic PV foci. Recovery of local PV potential and the inability to abolish it were significantly associated with AF recurrences (90% success rate with versus 55% without PV potential abolition). PV stenosis was noted acutely in 5 of 6 cases, remained unchanged at restudy, and was associated with RF power >45 W. Conclusions —Multiple PV foci are involved in initiation of AF, and elimination of PV muscle conduction is associated with clinical success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S.-A., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., Kim, Y.-H., Klein, G., Natale, A., Packer, D., et al. (2010) · Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · doi:10.1161/circep.109.859116 · Cited by 2,852
Fuster, V., Rydén, L. E., Cannom, D. S., Crijns, H. J., Curtis, A. B., Ellenbogen, K. A., Halperin, J. L., Le Heuzey, J.-Y., Kay, G. N., Lowe, J. E., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.177292 · Cited by 2,805
Calkins, H., Hindricks, G., Cappato, R., Kim, Y.-H., Saad, E. B., Aguinaga, L., Akar, J. G., Badhwar, V., Brugada, J., Camm, J., et al. (2017) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012 · Cited by 2,755
Self-citationCalkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, A. J., Chen, S.-A., Crijns, H. J. G., Damiano, R. J., Davies, D. W., DiMarco, J., et al. (2012) · Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eus027 · Cited by 2,722
Self-citationThe clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction
Widlansky, M. E., Gokce, N., Keaney, J. F., & Vita, J. A. (2003) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00994-x · Cited by 1,749
Metadata
- Authors
- Haïssaguerre, M., Jaïs, P., Shah, D. C., Garrigue, S., Takahashi, A., Lavergne, T., Hocini, M., Peng, J. T., Roudaut, R., & Clémenty, J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-03-28
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1409-1417
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2088825357
- Cited by
- 922
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiological End Point for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Initiated From Multiple Pulmonary Venous Foci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1409
- The paper
- Haïssaguerre, M., Jaïs, P., Shah, D. C., Garrigue, S., Takahashi, A., Lavergne, T., Hocini, M., Peng, J. T., Roudaut, R., & Clémenty, J. (2000). Electrophysiological End Point for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Initiated From Multiple Pulmonary Venous Foci. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.