Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 922

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electrophysiological End Point for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Initiated From Multiple Pulmonary Venous Foci

Haïssaguerre, Michel, Jaïs, Pierre, Shah, Dipen C., Garrigue, Stéphane, Takahashi, Atsushi, Lavergne, Thomas, Hocini, Mélèze, Peng, Jing Tian, Roudaut, Raymond, Clémenty, Jacques·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —The end point for catheter ablation of pulmonary vein (PV) foci initiating atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been determined. Methods and Results —Ninety patients underwent mapping during spontaneous or induced ectopy and/or AF initiation. Ostial PV ablation was performed by use of angiograms to precisely define targeted sites. Success defined by elimination of AF without drugs was correlated with the procedural end point of the abolition of distal PV potentials. A total of 197 arrhythmogenic PV foci (97%)—single in 31% and multiple in 69%—and 6 atrial foci were identified. A discrete radiofrequency (RF) application eliminated the PV potentials in 9 PV foci, whereas 2 foci from the same PV required RF applications at separate sites in 19 cases. In others, a wider region was targeted with progressive elimination of ectopy. In 49 patients, multiple sessions were necessary owing to recurrent or new ectopy. The clinical success rates were 93%, 73%, and 55% in patients with 1, 2, and ≥3 arrhythmogenic PV foci. Recovery of local PV potential and the inability to abolish it were significantly associated with AF recurrences (90% success rate with versus 55% without PV potential abolition). PV stenosis was noted acutely in 5 of 6 cases, remained unchanged at restudy, and was associated with RF power >45 W. Conclusions —Multiple PV foci are involved in initiation of AF, and elimination of PV muscle conduction is associated with clinical success.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1409

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 922

Metadata

Authors
Haïssaguerre, M., Jaïs, P., Shah, D. C., Garrigue, S., Takahashi, A., Lavergne, T., Hocini, M., Peng, J. T., Roudaut, R., & Clémenty, J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-03-28
Volume
101
Issue
12
Pages
1409-1417
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2088825357
Cited by
922
References
0
FWCI
44.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiological End Point for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Initiated From Multiple Pulmonary Venous Foci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1409
The paper
Haïssaguerre, M., Jaïs, P., Shah, D. C., Garrigue, S., Takahashi, A., Lavergne, T., Hocini, M., Peng, J. T., Roudaut, R., & Clémenty, J. (2000). Electrophysiological End Point for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Initiated From Multiple Pulmonary Venous Foci. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1409

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.