The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly: Prevalence and Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Background —Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI), patient characteristics and association with outcomes remain poorly defined in the elderly. Methods and Results —We evaluated 106 780 Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years of age from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project treated for acute MI between January 1994 and February 1996 to determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of AF complicating acute MI in elderly patients. Patients were categorized on the basis of the presence of AF, and those with AF were further subdivided by time of AF (present on arrival versus developing during hospitalization). AF and non-AF patients were compared by univariate analysis, and logistic regression modeling was used to identify clinical predictors of AF. The influence of AF on outcomes was evaluated by unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves and logistic regression models. AF was documented in 23 565 patients (22.1%): 11 510 presented with AF and 12 055 developed AF during hospitalization. AF patients were older, had more advanced heart failure, and were more likely to have had a prior MI and undergone coronary revascularization. AF patients had poorer outcomes, including higher in-hospital (25.3% versus 16.0%), 30-day (29.3% versus 19.1%), and 1-year (48.3% versus 32.7%) mortality. AF remained an independent predictor of in-hospital (odds ratio [OR], 1.21), 30-day (OR, 1.20), and 1-year (OR, 1.34) mortality after multivariate adjustment. Patients developing AF during hospitalization had a worse prognosis than patients who presented with AF. Conclusions —AF is a common complication of acute MI in elderly patients and independently influences mortality, particularly when it develops during hospitalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
January, C. T., Wann, L. S., Alpert, J. S., Calkins, H., Cigarroa, J. E., Cleveland, J. C., Conti, J. B., Ellinor, P. T., Ezekowitz, M. D., Field, M. E., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022 · Cited by 2,955
Fuster, V., Rydén, L. E., Cannom, D. S., Crijns, H. J., Curtis, A. B., Ellenbogen, K. A., Halperin, J. L., Le Heuzey, J.-Y., Kay, G. N., Lowe, J. E., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.177292 · Cited by 2,805
January, C. T., Wann, L. S., Calkins, H., Chen, L. Y., Cigarroa, J. E., Cleveland, J. C., Ellinor, P. T., Ezekowitz, M. D., Field, M. E., Furie, K. L., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000665 · Cited by 2,744
Fuster, V., Rydén, L. E., Cannom, D. S., Crijns, H. J., Curtis, A. B., Ellenbogen, K. A., Halperin, J. L., Kay, G. N., Le Huezey, J.-Y., Lowe, J. E., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318214876d · Cited by 859
Time-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journals
van Walraven, C., Davis, D., Forster, A. J., & Wells, G. A. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.008 · Cited by 337
Jabre, P., Roger, V. L., Murad, M. H., Chamberlain, A. M., Prokop, L., Adnet, F., & Jouven, X. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.986661 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Rathore, S. S., Berger, A. K., Weinfurt, K. P., Schulman, K. A., Oetgen, W. J., Gersh, B. J., & Solomon, A. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-03-07
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 969-974
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2093754506
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.