The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Classification of Unstable Angina Revisited
Abstract
Abstract —Unstable angina is a critical phase of coronary heart disease with widely variable symptoms and prognosis. A decade ago, a classification of unstable angina based on clinical symptoms was introduced. This system was then validated by prospective clinical studies to correlate with the prognosis and was linked to angiographic and histological findings. It has been used to categorize patients in many large clinical trials. In recent years, the pathophysiological roles of platelet activation and inflammation in unstable angina have been elucidated. Subsequently, improved markers of myocardial injury, acute-phase proteins, and hemostatic markers that may be associated with clinical outcomes have been identified. Particularly, cardiac-specific troponin T and troponin I have been shown to represent the best predictors of early risk in patients with angina at rest. Accordingly, it is suggested that the original classification be extended by subclassifying one large group of unstable angina patients, ie, those with angina at rest within the past 48 hours (class IIIB), into troponin-positive (T pos ) and troponin-negative (T neg ) patients. The 30-days risk for death and myocardial infarction is considered to be up to 20% in class IIIB-T pos but <2% in class IIIB-T neg patients. Initial results suggest that troponins may function as surrogate markers for thrombus formation and can effectively guide therapy with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins. These observations provide additional impetus for adding the measurement of these markers to the clinical classification and represent a novel concept of treating these high-risk patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antman, E. M., Tanasijevic, M. J., Thompson, B., Schactman, M., McCabe, C. H., Cannon, C. P., Fischer, G. A., Fung, A. Y., Thompson, C., Wybenga, D., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199610313351802 · Cited by 1,749
Self-citation
Cited by
JCS 2018 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Kimura, K., Kimura, T., Ishihara, M., Nakagawa, Y., Nakao, K., Miyauchi, K., Sakamoto, T., Tsujita, K., Hagiwara, N., Miyazaki, S., et al. (2019) · Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/circj.cj-19-0133 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamm, C. W., & Braunwald, E.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-07-04
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 118-122
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2161579754
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Classification of Unstable Angina Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.1.118
- The paper
- Hamm, C. W., & Braunwald, E. (2000). A Classification of Unstable Angina Revisited. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.1.118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.