Differential pacing for distinguishing block from persistent conduction through an ablation line
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because complete linear conduction block is necessary to minimize the recurrence of reentrant tachycardias such as typical atrial flutter, we investigated a simple technique to recognize a persistent gap or complete linear block. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively evaluated cavotricuspid isthmus conduction in 50 patients (age 63+/-8 years, 43 men) after radiofrequency ablation. The distal and proximal bipoles of a quadripolar catheter placed close to the ablation line were successively stimulated during recording from the ablation line. We hypothesized that because the initial and terminal components of local potentials reflected activation at the ipsilateral and contralateral borders of the ablation lesion, a change to a more proximal pacing site without moving the catheter would prolong the stimulus to the initial component timing, whereas the response of the terminal component would depend on the presence of block or persistent conduction. A shortening or no change in timing of the terminal component would indicate block, whereas lengthening would indicate persistent gap conduction. The results were compared with previously described criteria for isthmus block. Ninety-two sites were assessed: 17 before and 75 after the achievement of complete isthmus block. The timing of the initial component was delayed by 19+/-9 ms, and the terminal component was advanced by 13+/-8 ms after block and delayed by 12+/-9 ms in case of persisting conduction. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for linear block were 100%, 75%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An accurate assessment of isthmus block or persistent isthmus conduction is possible with this technique of differential pacing.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Complete, persistent, bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block is the procedural endpoint, and when achieved, arrhythmia recurrence occurs in less than 10% of cases.
“Complete, persistent, bidirectional CTI block is the procedure endpoint, and, if attained, recurrence of the arrhythmia is seen in ,10% of cases.181,182”
From European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE) (2017) · cites this paper as [181]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 242
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Waldo AL. Atrial flutter: mechanisms, clinical features, and management. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1995:666 -681.
- Lesh MD. Catheter ablation of atrial flutter and tachycardia. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside, 3nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2000:1009 -1027.
- Authors
- Shah, D., Haïssaguerre, M., Takahashi, A., Jaïs, P., Hocini, M., & Clémenty, J.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque (FR)
- From the Département de Rythmologie, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-09-26
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1517-1522
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2020667210
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Keywords
- atrial flutter, radiofrequency ablation, local potential, reentrant tachycardia
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Atrial Flutter, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radiography, Tricuspid Valve, Catheter Ablation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review