Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Autonomic Nerves for Prevention of Vagal Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
Schauerte, Patrick, Scherlag, Benjamin J., Pitha, Jan, Scherlag, Michael A., Reynolds, Dwight, Lazzara, Ralph, Jackman, Warren M.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background—Vagal stimulation shortens the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and maintains atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigated whether the parasympathetic pathways that innervate the atria can be identified and ablated by use of transvenous catheter stimulation and radiofrequency current catheter ablation (RFCA) techniques. Methods and Results—In 11 dogs, AERPs were determined at 7 atrial sites during bilateral cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and electrical stimulation of the third fat pad (20 Hz) in the right pulmonary artery (RPA). VNS shortened the AERP at all sites (from 123±4 to 39±4 ms,P<0.001) and increased the covariance of AERP (COV-AERP) (from 9±3% to 27±13%,P<0.001). RPA stimulation shortened the AERP at all sites from 123±4 to 66±13 ms (P<0.001) and increased the COV-AERP from 9±3% to 30±12% (P<0.001). In 7 dogs, transvascular RFCA of the parasympathetic pathways along the RPA was performed, and in 3 dogs, additional RFCA of parasympathetic fibers along the inferior (n=2) or superior (n=1) vena cava was performed. RFCA blunted the AERP shortening at all sites during VNS (114±4 ms after RFCA), abolished the increase of COV-AERP during VNS (12±7% after RFCA), and led to an increase of the baseline AERP (123±4 ms before versus 127±3 ms after RFCA,P=0.002). Before RFCA, AF could be induced and maintained as long as VNS was continued, whereas after RFCA, AF was no longer inducible during VNS. Conclusions—Transvascular atrial parasympathetic nerve system modification by RFCA abolishes vagally mediated AF. This antifibrillatory procedure may provide a foundation for investigating the usefulness of neural ablation in chronic animal models of AF and eventually in patients with AF and high vagal tone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.22.2774

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Schauerte, P., Scherlag, B. J., Pitha, J., Scherlag, M. A., Reynolds, D., Lazzara, R., & Jackman, W. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-11-28
Volume
102
Issue
22
Pages
2774-2780
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2131984396
Cited by
378
References
0
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Autonomic Nerves for Prevention of Vagal Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.22.2774
The paper
Schauerte, P., Scherlag, B. J., Pitha, J., Scherlag, M. A., Reynolds, D., Lazzara, R., & Jackman, W. M. (2000). Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Autonomic Nerves for Prevention of Vagal Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.22.2774

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.