Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT

Open access
Achenbach, Stephan, Ulzheimer, Stefan, Baum, Ulrich, Kachelrieß, Marc, Ropers, Dieter, Giesler, Tom, Bautz, Werner, Daniel, Werner G., Kalender, Willi A., Moshage, Werner·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —We investigated the applicability and image quality of contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by multislice spiral CT using retrospective ECG gating. Methods and Results —Twenty-five patients in sinus rhythm (significant coronary artery stenoses ruled out by invasive angiography) were studied with a multislice spiral CT (Siemens SOMATOM Volume Zoom). In inspiration (mean breathhold, 37 seconds), a volume data set of the heart was acquired (intravenous contrast agent; 4×1-mm slice thickness; 500-ms rotation; table feed, 1.5 mm/360°). Simultaneous recording of the ECG permitted retrospective reconstruction of contiguous cross sections in intervals of 1 mm at any desired interval of the cardiac cycle. The mean duration of the image reconstruction window was 185 ms. Next to 3-dimensional reconstructions of the heart and coronary arteries, multiplanar reconstructions were rendered to determine the visualized length of the coronary arteries, the contrast-to-noise ratio, and the correlation of coronary artery diameters to quantitative coronary angiography. Conclusions —The coronary arteries could be visualized over long segments (left main, 9±4 mm; left anterior descending, 112±34 mm; left circumflex, 80±29 mm; right coronary artery, 116±33 mm). On average, 78±16% of these distances were visualized free of motion artifacts. The mean contrast-to-noise ratio was 9.3±3.3. Coronary artery diameters in multislice spiral CT showed close correlation to quantitative coronary angiography (CT, 3.3±1.0 mm; angiography, 3.2±0.9 mm; mean difference, 0.38 mm; r =0.86). Contrast-enhanced multislice spiral CT permits visualization of the coronary artery lumen. Further studies are necessary to determine whether image quality is sufficient to reliably detect coronary artery stenoses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.23.2823

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Authors
Achenbach, S., Ulzheimer, S., Baum, U., Kachelrieß, M., Ropers, D., Giesler, T., Bautz, W., Daniel, W. G., Kalender, W. A., & Moshage, W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-12-05
Volume
102
Issue
23
Pages
2823-2828
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2141858220
Cited by
434
References
0
FWCI
23.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.23.2823
The paper
Achenbach, S., Ulzheimer, S., Baum, U., Kachelrieß, M., Ropers, D., Giesler, T., Bautz, W., Daniel, W. G., Kalender, W. A., & Moshage, W. (2000). Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.23.2823

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.