The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT
Open accessAbstract
Background —We investigated the applicability and image quality of contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by multislice spiral CT using retrospective ECG gating. Methods and Results —Twenty-five patients in sinus rhythm (significant coronary artery stenoses ruled out by invasive angiography) were studied with a multislice spiral CT (Siemens SOMATOM Volume Zoom). In inspiration (mean breathhold, 37 seconds), a volume data set of the heart was acquired (intravenous contrast agent; 4×1-mm slice thickness; 500-ms rotation; table feed, 1.5 mm/360°). Simultaneous recording of the ECG permitted retrospective reconstruction of contiguous cross sections in intervals of 1 mm at any desired interval of the cardiac cycle. The mean duration of the image reconstruction window was 185 ms. Next to 3-dimensional reconstructions of the heart and coronary arteries, multiplanar reconstructions were rendered to determine the visualized length of the coronary arteries, the contrast-to-noise ratio, and the correlation of coronary artery diameters to quantitative coronary angiography. Conclusions —The coronary arteries could be visualized over long segments (left main, 9±4 mm; left anterior descending, 112±34 mm; left circumflex, 80±29 mm; right coronary artery, 116±33 mm). On average, 78±16% of these distances were visualized free of motion artifacts. The mean contrast-to-noise ratio was 9.3±3.3. Coronary artery diameters in multislice spiral CT showed close correlation to quantitative coronary angiography (CT, 3.3±1.0 mm; angiography, 3.2±0.9 mm; mean difference, 0.38 mm; r =0.86). Contrast-enhanced multislice spiral CT permits visualization of the coronary artery lumen. Further studies are necessary to determine whether image quality is sufficient to reliably detect coronary artery stenoses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Achenbach, S., Giesler, T., Ropers, D., Ulzheimer, S., Derlien, H., Schulte, C., Wenkel, E., Moshage, W., Bautz, W., Daniel, W. G., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.21.2535 · Cited by 667
Self-citationThematic review series: Patient-Oriented Research. Imaging atherosclerosis: state of the art
Crouse, J. R. (2006) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r600012-jlr200 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Achenbach, S., Ulzheimer, S., Baum, U., Kachelrieß, M., Ropers, D., Giesler, T., Bautz, W., Daniel, W. G., Kalender, W. A., & Moshage, W.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-12-05
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2823-2828
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2141858220
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.23.2823
- The paper
- Achenbach, S., Ulzheimer, S., Baum, U., Kachelrieß, M., Ropers, D., Giesler, T., Bautz, W., Daniel, W. G., Kalender, W. A., & Moshage, W. (2000). Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.23.2823
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.