Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Brain Infarction: The Étude du Profil Génétique de l’Infarctus Cérébral (GÉNIC) Case-Control Study

Open access
Touboul, Pierre-Jean, Elbaz, Alexis, Koller, Cornelia, Lucas, Christian, Adraï, Valérie, Chédru, François, Amarenco, Pierre, Investigators, for the GÉNIC·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —The use of intima-media thickness (IMT) as an outcome measure in observational studies and intervention trials relies on the view that it reflects early stages of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk. There is little knowledge concerning the relation between IMT and brain infarction (BI). Methods and Results —We investigated the relation of IMT with BI and its subtypes in 470 cases and 463 controls. Cases with BI proven by MRI were consecutively recruited and classified into subtypes by cause of BI. Controls were recruited among individuals hospitalized at the same institutions and matched for age, sex, and center. IMT was measured at the far wall of both common carotid arteries (CCA) using an automatic detection system. Adventitia-to-adventitia diameters and CCA-IMT were measured on transverse views; lumen diameter was computed using these measures. Mean (±SEM) CCA-IMT was higher in cases (0.797±0.006 mm) than in controls (0.735±0.006 mm; P <0.0001). This difference remained after adjustment for lumen diameter and when analyses were restricted to subjects free of previous cardiovascular or cerebrovascular history. The difference in CCA-IMT between cases and controls was significant in the main subtypes. The risk of BI increased continuously with increasing CCA-IMT. The odds ratio per SD increase (0.150 mm) was 1.82 (95% confidence interval, 1.54 to 2.15); adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors slightly attenuated this relation (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.45 to 2.07). Conclusions —An increased CCA-IMT was associated with BI, both overall and in the main subtypes. An increased IMT may help select patients at high risk for BI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.3.313

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Touboul, P.-J., Elbaz, A., Koller, C., Lucas, C., Adraï, V., Chédru, F., Amarenco, P., & Investigators, F. T. G.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-07-18
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
313-318
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2161816738
Cited by
270
References
3
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Brain Infarction: The Étude du Profil Génétique de l’Infarctus Cérébral (GÉNIC) Case-Control Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.3.313
The paper
Touboul, P.-J., Elbaz, A., Koller, C., Lucas, C., Adraï, V., Chédru, F., Amarenco, P., & Investigators, F. T. G. (2000). Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Brain Infarction: The Étude du Profil Génétique de l’Infarctus Cérébral (GÉNIC) Case-Control Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.3.313

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.