Cited by 220Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsCongenital heart defects research

What is the Optimal Age for Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot?

Van Arsdell, G. S., Maharaj, G. S., Tom, J., Rao, V. K., Coles, J. G., Freedom, R. M., Williams, W. G., McCrindle, B. W.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background Controversy regarding the timing for the repair of tetralogy of Fallot centers around initial palliation versus primary repair for the symptomatic neonate/young infant and the optimal age for repair of the asymptomatic child. We changed our approach from one of initial palliation in the infant to one of primary repair around the age of 6 months, or earlier if clinically indicated. We examined the effects of this change in protocol and age on outcomes. Methods and results The records of 227 consecutive children who had repair of isolated tetralogy of Fallot from January 1993 to June 1998 were reviewed. The median age of repair by year fell from 17 to 8 months (P: 12 months. The best survival and physiological outcomes were achieved with primary repair in children aged 3 to 11 months. Conclusions On the basis of mortality and physiological outcomes, the optimal age for elective repair of tetralogy of Fallot is 3 to 11 months of age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-123

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older age at the time of surgery is a risk factor for postoperative mortality.

    “Other studies have shown a similar trend and have identified older age at the time of surgery as a risk factor for postoperative mortality.6”

    From Tetralogy of Fallot in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 14 · Cited by 220

Authors
Van Arsdell, G. S., Maharaj, G. S., Tom, J., Rao, V. K., Coles, J. G., Freedom, R. M., Williams, W. G., & McCrindle, B. W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-11-07
Volume
102
Issue
Supplement 3
Pages
III-123-III-129
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2137126315
Cited by
220
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
tetralogy of Fallot, primary repair, palliative shunt, timing of surgical repair, neonatal palliation, postoperative mortality, lactate clearance, length of hospital stay, physiological outcomes
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Blood Pressure, Canada, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Length of Stay, Male, Palliative Care, Reoperation, Tetralogy of Fallot, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Age Distribution, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review