Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,429

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Long-Term Outcome and Prognostic Implications With Quantitative Doppler Assessment

Grigioni, Francesco, Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice, Zehr, Kenton J., Bailey, Kent R., Tajik, A. Jamil·2001·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Myocardial infarction (MI) can directly cause ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), which has been touted as an indicator of poor prognosis in acute and early phases after MI. However, in the chronic post-MI phase, prognostic implications of IMR presence and degree are poorly defined. Methods and Results —We analyzed 303 patients with previous (>16 days) Q-wave MI by ECG who underwent transthoracic echocardiography: 194 with IMR quantitatively assessed in routine practice and 109 without IMR matched for baseline age (71±11 versus 70±9 years, P =0.20), sex, and ejection fraction (EF, 33±14% versus 34±11%, P =0.14). In IMR patients, regurgitant volume (RVol) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) area were 36±24 mL/beat and 21±12 mm 2 , respectively. After 5 years, total mortality and cardiac mortality for patients with IMR (62±5% and 50±6%, respectively) were higher than for those without IMR (39±6% and 30±5%, respectively) (both P <0.001). In multivariate analysis, independently of all baseline characteristics, particularly age and EF, the adjusted relative risks of total and cardiac mortality associated with the presence of IMR (1.88, P =0.003 and 1.83, P =0.014, respectively) and quantified degree of IMR defined by RVol ≥30 mL (2.05, P =0.002 and 2.01, P =0.009) and by ERO ≥20 mm 2 (2.23, P =0.003 and 2.38, P =0.004) were high. Conclusions —In the chronic phase after MI, IMR presence is associated with excess mortality independently of baseline characteristics and degree of ventricular dysfunction. The mortality risk is related directly to the degree of IMR as defined by ERO and RVol. Therefore, IMR detection and quantification provide major information for risk stratification and clinical decision making in the chronic post-MI phase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.103.13.1759

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,429

Metadata

Authors
Grigioni, F., Enriquez-Sarano, M., Zehr, K. J., Bailey, K. R., & Tajik, A. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-04-03
Volume
103
Issue
13
Pages
1759-1764
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2136335380
Cited by
1,429
References
1
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Long-Term Outcome and Prognostic Implications With Quantitative Doppler Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.103.13.1759
The paper
Grigioni, F., Enriquez-Sarano, M., Zehr, K. J., Bailey, K. R., & Tajik, A. J. (2001). Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Long-Term Outcome and Prognostic Implications With Quantitative Doppler Assessment. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.13.1759

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.