Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of Reentrant Circuit in Macroreentrant Right Atrial Tachycardia After Surgical Repair of Congenital Heart Disease: Isolated Channels Between Scars Allow “Focal” Ablation

Nakagawa, Hiroshi, Shah, Nayyar, Matsudaira, Kagari, Overholt, Edward, Chandrasekaran, Krishnaswamy, Beckman, Karen J., Spector, Peter, Calame, James D., Rao, Arun, Hasdemir, Can, Otomo, Kenichiro, Wang, Zulu, Lazzara, Ralph, Jackman, Warren M.·2001·Circulation

Abstract

Background —The purpose of this study was to characterize the circuit of macroreentrant right atrial tachycardia (MacroAT) in patients after surgical repair of congenital heart disease (SR-CHD). Methods and Results —Sixteen patients with atrial tachycardia (AT) after SR-CHD were studied (atrial septal defect in 6, tetralogy of Fallot in 4, and Fontan procedure in 6). Electroanatomic right atrial maps were obtained during 15 MacroATs in 13 patients, focal AT in 1 patient, and atrial pacing in 2 patients without stable AT. A large area of low bipolar voltage (≤0.5 mV) involved most of the free wall in all patients and contained 2 to 7 dense scars or lines of double potentials, forming 29 narrow channels (width ≤2.7 cm) between scars in all but 1 patient, who had a single scar and only focal AT. All 15 MacroATs were propagated through narrow channels. Ablation within the channel eliminated all 15 MacroATs with 1 to 3 (median 1) radiofrequency applications. Ablation was performed in 9 other channels identified during MacroAT (5 patients) and in 5 channels identified during atrial pacing (2 patients). Conduction block was obtained across 28 of 29 channels. After ablation, reproducible sustained right AT was not induced in any patient. During follow-up (median 13.5 months), new MacroATs, atrial fibrillation, or palpitations occurred in 3 of 16 patients. Conclusions —MacroAT after SR-CHD requires a large area of low voltage containing ≥2 scars forming narrow channels. Ablation within the channels eliminates MacroAT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.103.5.699

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Nakagawa, H., Shah, N., Matsudaira, K., Overholt, E., Chandrasekaran, K., Beckman, K. J., Spector, P., Calame, J. D., Rao, A., Hasdemir, C., Otomo, K., Wang, Z., Lazzara, R., & Jackman, W. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2001-02-06
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
699-709
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2618592072
Cited by
380
References
0
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Reentrant Circuit in Macroreentrant Right Atrial Tachycardia After Surgical Repair of Congenital Heart Disease: Isolated Channels Between Scars Allow “Focal” Ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.103.5.699
The paper
Nakagawa, H., Shah, N., Matsudaira, K., Overholt, E., Chandrasekaran, K., Beckman, K. J., Spector, P., Calame, J. D., Rao, A., Hasdemir, C., Otomo, K., Wang, Z., Lazzara, R., & Jackman, W. M. (2001). Characterization of Reentrant Circuit in Macroreentrant Right Atrial Tachycardia After Surgical Repair of Congenital Heart Disease: Isolated Channels Between Scars Allow “Focal” Ablation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.5.699

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.