The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selective Cine Coronary Arteriography: Correlation with Clinical Findings in 1,000 Patients
Open accessAbstract
The clinical records of 1,000 patients who had adequate selective cine coronary arteriography were reviewed. The clinical diagnoses were made by a physician who had no knowledge of the arteriographic findings. Correlation of the clinical diagnoses with the arteriographic findings was made subsequently. Symptomatic coronary disease was accompanied by arteriographic evidence of significant obstruction of major coronary arteries in most instances. A close correlation existed between the clinical diagnosis of angina pectoris without rest pain and significant arterial obstruction (95%). A similar correlation was found between QRS evidence of myocardial infarction and severe arterial obstruction (99%). The demonstrated arterial obstruction in patients who had angina pectoris almost always was severe and usually almost total or total in one or more major vessels. In myocardial infarction the demonstrated obstruction was always severe and generally almost total or total. The correlation between clinical and arteriographic findings was moderately close in patients who had angina with symptoms at rest. The correlation between the arteriographic findings and less characteristic clinical syndromes (rest pain only, 79%, coronary failure, 78%, and especially atypical angina pectoris, 65%) was not so close. In congestive failure secondary to coronary disease, arterial obstruction was extensive unless ventricular aneurysm, mitral insufficiency, arrhythmia, arterial hypotension, or some other complication was present. Most patients thought to have noncoronary symptoms had no significant obstructive lesions. In 37% of the entire group of patients, almost all of whom had been suspected of having coronary disease by some physicians, no significant arteriographic obstruction was demonstrated; in 27% the arteriograms were normal. Diagnoses, based on appraisal of the clinical records without knowledge of the arteriographic findings, yielded 83% correlation with abnormal arteriographic findings in 700 patients thought to have coronary disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease
Task Force Members, Montalescot, G., Sechtem, U., Achenbach, S., Andreotti, F., Arden, C., Budaj, A., Bugiardini, R., Crea, F., Cuisset, T., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296 · Cited by 4,510
Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Diamond, G. A., & Forrester, J. S. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197906143002402 · Cited by 2,664
“Microvascular angina” as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries
Cannon, R. O., & Epstein, S. E. (1988) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(88)91180-0 · Cited by 580
Jeejeebhoy, F. M., Dorian, P., & Newman, D. M. (2000) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00103-8 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- PROUDFIT, W. L., SHIREY, E. K., & SONES, F. M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1966-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 901-910
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2036169724
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective Cine Coronary Arteriography: Correlation with Clinical Findings in 1,000 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.33.6.901
- The paper
- PROUDFIT, W. L., SHIREY, E. K., & SONES, F. M. (1966). Selective Cine Coronary Arteriography: Correlation with Clinical Findings in 1,000 Patients. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.33.6.901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.