The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probability of Middle-Aged Men Developing Coronary Heart Disease in Five Years
Abstract
Characteristics of 11,132 men aged 40-59 years and free from coronary heart disease (CHD) at entry were related to follow-up experience, using multivariate analysis. In 5 years among 2,404 U. S. railroad men and 8,728 European men there were 615 cases of CHD, 214 of whom died from CHD or suffered definite nonfatal infarction. With five entry characteristics (age, systolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol, smoking habit, and body mass index), multiple logistic solutions for Europeans and Americans, separately, gave estimates of the individual probability of CHD. Classified by deciled scores for these probabilities, the expected and observed CHD cases were highly correlated (r = 0.930-0.981). Predictions based on European data applied to Americans, and vice versa, gave similar high correlations but American incidence was excessive compared with European experience. Application of the analysis coefficients obtained from data in Europe and in the U. S. railroad to 6,221 other U. S. men 40-59 years of age, CHD-free at entry, gave good prediction of relative risk (r = 0.94) for observed versus predicted cases in deciles of risk score; however, the actual numbers of cases were underpredicted. From single measurements of a few characteristics the multiple logistic solution usefully estimates the relative risk of CHD for individuals. Age, systolic pressure, and serum cholesterol are universally powerful predictors of risk. Variables not measured in this study or not yet identified contribute to the risk of CHD among American men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure and risk of coronary heart disease
Kannel, W. B., Gordon, T., & Schwartz, M. J. (1971) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(71)90428-0 · Cited by 925
Cited by
Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
Damen, J. A. A. G., Hooft, L., Schuit, E., Debray, T. P. A., Collins, G. S., Tzoulaki, I., Lassale, C. M., Siontis, G. C. M., Chiocchia, V., Roberts, C., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i2416 · Cited by 935
Recent Evidence Supporting Psychologic and Social Risk Factors for Coronary Disease
Jenkins, C. D. (1976) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197605062941904 · Cited by 503
Nebivolol vs Amlodipine as First-line Treatment of Essential Arterial Hypertension in the Elderly
Mazza, A., Gil-Extremera, B., Maldonato, A., Toutouzas, T., & Pessina, A. C. (2002) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.1080/080370502760050421 · Cited by 57
Multivariate prediction of total and cardiovascular mortality in an obese Polynesian population.
Crews, D. E. (1989) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.79.8.982 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- KEYS, A., ARAVANIS, C., BLACKBURN, H., VAN BUCHEM, F. S. P., BUZINA, R., DJORDJEVIC, B. S., FIDANZA, F., KARVONEN, M. J., MENOTTI, A., PUDDU, V., & TAYLOR, H. L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1972-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 815-828
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2019274306
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probability of Middle-Aged Men Developing Coronary Heart Disease in Five Years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.45.4.815
- The paper
- KEYS, A., ARAVANIS, C., BLACKBURN, H., VAN BUCHEM, F. S. P., BUZINA, R., DJORDJEVIC, B. S., FIDANZA, F., KARVONEN, M. J., MENOTTI, A., PUDDU, V., & TAYLOR, H. L. (1972). Probability of Middle-Aged Men Developing Coronary Heart Disease in Five Years. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.45.4.815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.