The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coronary Artery Disease in 116 Kindred with Familial Type II Hyperlipoproteinemia
Open accessAbstract
Analysis of cardiovascular status in adult relatives of 116 kindred affected with familial hyperbetalipoproteinemia (type II hyperlipoproteinemia) was carried out to assess coronary artery disease (CAD) risk in relatives with type II (II) compared to unaffected family members. Over 90% of the 738 living relatives were interviewed by one investigator and 12 lead electrocardiograms were obtained. In these, and in 285 deceased relatives, physician and hospital records were utilized to determine CAD events by standard criteria. This study, the largest of its kind, permitted more precise and extensive determination of the CAD risk accompanying severe hyperbetalipoproteinemia than has heretofore been possible. CAD was diagnosed in 29.5% of II's compared with 10.5% of normal relatives (N) ( P < .001). The II's and N's did not differ significantly with regard to age distribution, sex, hypertension, smoking habits, or body mass index. According to the Rose questionnaire, angina pectoris was diagnosed in 21.8% of II's and 6.5% of N's ( P < .001). Documented myocardial infarction occurred in 6% of II's versus 1% of N's ( P = .002). CAD death or myocardial infarction occurred in 10.1% of II's compared with 1.8% of N's ( P < .001). The cumulative probability of nonfatal or fatal CAD by age 40 in male II's was 16% (1 in 6); by age 60, the expectation of an event had risen to 52% (1 in 2). Among male N's, the risk of nonfatal or fatal CAD by age 60 was 12.7%, lagging 20 years behind that seen in male II's. In female II's, the risk of nonfatal or fatal CAD by age 60 was 32.8% compared with only 9.1% in female N's.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival
Cutler, S. J., & Ederer, F. (1958) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7 · Cited by 2,870
Cited by
KANNEL, W. B., CASTELLI, W. P., & GORDON, T. (1979) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-90-1-85 · Cited by 1,311
Wiegman, A., Gidding, S. S., Watts, G. F., Chapman, M. J., Ginsberg, H. N., Cuchel, M., Ose, L., Averna, M., Boileau, C., Borén, J., et al. (2015) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv157 · Cited by 891
“Children with untreated HeFH have a dramatic increase in risk of premature CHD after age 20 years.(9,10) Familial hypercholesterolaemia in its homozygous form”
BackgroundGidding, S. S., Ann Champagne, M., de Ferranti, S. D., Defesche, J., Ito, M. K., Knowles, J. W., McCrindle, B., Raal, F., Rader, D., Santos, R. D., et al. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000297 · Cited by 723
Levy, R. I., Brensike, J. F., Epstein, S. E., Kelsey, S. F., Passamani, E. R., Richardson, J. M., Loh, I. K., Stone, N. J., Aldrich, R. F., & Battaglini, J. W. (1984) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.69.2.325 · Cited by 437
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- STONE, N. J., LEVY, R. I., FREDRICKSON, D. S., & VERTER, J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1974-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 476-488
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1975036384
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronary Artery Disease in 116 Kindred with Familial Type II Hyperlipoproteinemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.49.3.476
- The paper
- STONE, N. J., LEVY, R. I., FREDRICKSON, D. S., & VERTER, J. (1974). Coronary Artery Disease in 116 Kindred with Familial Type II Hyperlipoproteinemia. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.49.3.476
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.