The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved efficiency of treadmill exercise testing using a multiple lead ECG system and basic hemodynamic exercise response.
Open accessAbstract
One hundred consecutive men with a normal ECG at rest had a maximal treadmill test using 14 leads during and post-exercise. Coronary arteriography performed the following day revealed coronary stenoses greater than or equal to 70% in 66 patients. Test results obtained from a V5 lead were compared to different lead combinations and were correlated with arteriographic findings. A positive exercise test occurred in 37 men using an isolated V5 lead compared to 50 men (P less than 0.05) using 11 leads, 52 men (P less than 0.05) using a combined CM5, CC5, Cl (inferior) lead system and 58 (P less than 0.001) men using all 14 leads. The predictive value of a positive test varied between 89-95% and was not changed significantly by the addition of multiple leads. The 14 lead ECG was positive in 43/45 (96%) patients with multivessel disease. Parameters which helped to predict multivessel disease using 14 leads were 1) the time that ischemia first appeared 2) the pressure-rate product at the time ischemia first appeared, and 3) the maximum workload that could be attained. In general, the magnitude of ST-segment depression and the time required for a positive ECG to return to normal postexercise were not useful predictors of multivessel disease. We conclude that the use of multiple leads improves the sensitivity and efficiency of the maximal treadmill exercise test. The usefulness of exercise test results can be further improved if multiple leads are combined with physiologic data collected during exercise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predictive Value of a Single Diagnostic Test in Unselected Populations
Vecchio, T. J. (1966) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196605262742104 · Cited by 941
Cited by
Fletcher, G. F., Ades, P. A., Kligfield, P., Arena, R., Balady, G. J., Bittner, V. A., Coke, L. A., Fleg, J. L., Forman, D. E., Gerber, T. C., et al. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31829b5b44 · Cited by 2,235
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaitman, B. R., Bourassa, M. G., Wagniart, P., Corbara, F., & Ferguson, R. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1978-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-79
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1980895017
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved efficiency of treadmill exercise testing using a multiple lead ECG system and basic hemodynamic exercise response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.57.1.71
- The paper
- Chaitman, B. R., Bourassa, M. G., Wagniart, P., Corbara, F., & Ferguson, R. J. (1978). Improved efficiency of treadmill exercise testing using a multiple lead ECG system and basic hemodynamic exercise response. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.57.1.71
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.