Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic value of a single exercise test 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Open access
Davidson, D M, DeBusk, R F·1980·Circulation

Abstract

The prognostic value of exercise testing was assessed in 195 men, mean age 54 ± 8 years, 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.In the first 82 men, effort was terminated at a heart rate of 130 beats/min in the absence of limiting symptoms, exertional hypotension or ventricular tachycardia.In the last 113 men, heart rate was not used as an end point.No complications of exercise testing were noted.From 13 clinical and treadmill test characteristics, a stepwise multiple logistic regression program identified exercise-induced ST-segment depression (ST;) 0.2 mV, angina pectoris and maximal work load < 4 multiples of resting energy expenditure (mets) as "risk factors" predictive of combined medical and surgical events (myocardial infarction, sudden death, cardiac arrest and coronary artery bypass surgery) in a subset of 92 patients followed 2 years or more.Clinical characteristics and exercise-induced ventricular ectopic activity were not predictive of such events.Life-table analysis in the entire population of 195 men confirmed the in- creased probability of combined medical and surgical events in patients with one or more "risk factors."For medical events alone, STI 0.2 mV and maximal work load < 4 mets were predictive, whereas angina pec- toris was not.STI > 0.2 mV and exercise-induced angina pectoris were predictive of surgical events.We conclude that patients without evidence of congestive heart failure 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction can safely underg6 symptom-limited exercise testing.Valuable prognostic information is gained that is independent of selected clinical characteristics.IDENTIFICATION of patients soon after myocar- dial infarction who are at relatively high risk for sub- sequent cardiac events offers two major benefits.High-risk patients could be identified for more aggressive medical or surgical therapy to reduce their morbidity and mortality.Patients at low risk could be spared needless invasive studies and unwarranted restriction of their physical activities.Routine clinical methods are sufficient to identify certain subgroups of patients at increased risk for sub-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.61.2.236

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Davidson, D. M., & DeBusk, R. F.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1980-02
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
236-242
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2052601352
Cited by
169
References
0
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic value of a single exercise test 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.61.2.236
The paper
Davidson, D. M., & DeBusk, R. F. (1980). Prognostic value of a single exercise test 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.61.2.236

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.