The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms.
Open accessAbstract
A computer-assisted technique has been developed to assess absolute coronary arterial dimensions from 35 mm cineangiograms. The boundaries of optically magnified and video-digitized coronary segments and the intracardiac catheter are defined by automated edge-detection techniques. Contour positions are corrected for pincushion distortion. The accuracy and precision of the edge detection procedure as assessed from cinefilms of contrast-filled acrylate (Perspex) models were -30 and 90 micrometers, respectively. The variability of the analysis procedure itself in terms of absolute arterial dimensions was less than 0.12 mm, and in terms of percentage arterial narrowing for coronary obstructions less than 2.74%. Short-, medium-, and long-term variability measurements were assessed from repeated coronary angiographic examinations performed 5 min, 1 hr, and 90 days apart, respectively. For all studies the mean differences in absolute diameters were less than 0.13 mm. The variability in obstruction diameter ranged from 0.22 mm for the best-controlled study (medium-term) to 0.36 mm for the least-controlled study (long-term); variability in reference diameter ranged from 0.15 to 0.66 mm, respectively. It is concluded that the biological variations are a source of major concern and that further attempts toward standardization of the angiographic procedure are seriously needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brown, G., Albers, J. J., Fisher, L. D., Schaefer, S. M., Lin, J.-T., Kaplan, C., Zhao, X.-Q., Bisson, B. D., Fitzpatrick, V. F., & Dodge, H. T. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199011083231901 · Cited by 2,159
Scanlon, P. J., Faxon, D. P., Audet, A.-M., Carabello, B., Dehmer, G. J., Eagle, K. A., Legako, R. D., Leon, D. F., Murray, J. A., Nissen, S. E., et al. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00126-6 · Cited by 1,123
Cocaine-Induced Coronary-Artery Vasoconstriction
Lange, R. A., Cigarroa, R. G., Yancy, C. W., Willard, J. E., Popma, J. J., Sills, M. N., McBride, W., Kim, A. S., & Hillis, L. D. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198912073212301 · Cited by 619
Potentiation of Cocaine-Induced Coronary Vasoconstriction by Beta-Adrenergic Blockade
Lange, R. A., Cigarroa, R. G., Flores, E. D., McBride, W., Kim, A. S., Wells, P. J., Bedotto, J. B., Danziger, R. S., & Hillis, L. D. (1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-112-12-897 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Reiber, J. H., Serruys, P. W., Kooijman, C. J., Wijns, W., Slager, C. J., Gerbrands, J. J., Schuurbiers, J. C., den Boer, A., & Hugenholtz, P. G.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1985-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 280-288
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2153259204
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.71.2.280
- The paper
- Reiber, J. H., Serruys, P. W., Kooijman, C. J., Wijns, W., Slager, C. J., Gerbrands, J. J., Schuurbiers, J. C., den Boer, A., & Hugenholtz, P. G. (1985). Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.71.2.280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.