The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct evidence from intraneural recordings for increased central sympathetic outflow in patients with heart failure.
Open accessAbstract
Patients with heart failure have increased vascular resistance and evidence for increased neurohumoral drive. High levels of circulating norepinephrine are found in patients with heart failure, but it is not known whether they reflect increased sympathetic neural activity or result from altered synthesis, release, or metabolism of norepinephrine. We used microneurography (peroneal nerve) to directly record sympathetic nerve activity to muscle (mSNA) and also measured plasma norepinephrine levels in patients with heart failure and in normal control subjects. Our goal was to determine whether sympathetic nerve activity is increased in patients with heart failure and whether plasma norepinephrine levels correlate with levels of mSNA in heart failure. Resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity in 16 patients with moderate to severe heart failure (54 +/- 5 bursts/min, mean +/- SE) was significantly higher (p less than .01) than the levels of activity in either nine age-matched normal control subjects (25 +/- 4 bursts/min) or 19 "young" normal control subjects (24 +/- 2 bursts/min). We found a significant correlation between plasma norepinephrine levels and mSNA (r = .73, p less than .05). Neither mSNA nor plasma norepinephrine levels correlated with total systemic vascular resistance, cardiac index, left ventricular ejection fraction, or heart rate. However, both mSNA and plasma norepinephrine levels showed significant positive correlations (p less than .05) with left ventricular filling pressures (r = .80, mSNA vs filling pressures; r = .82, norepinephrine levels vs filling pressures) and mean right atrial pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural Control of Renal Function*
Kopp, U. C., & DiBona, G. F. (2020) · Reflex Control of the Circulation · doi:10.1201/9780367813338-17 · Cited by 1,126
Sympathovagal Balance: A Critical Appraisal
Eckberg, D. L. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.9.3224 · Cited by 1,087
Catecholamine Metabolism: A Contemporary View with Implications for Physiology and Medicine
Eisenhofer, G., Kopin, I. J., & Goldstein, D. S. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.3.1 · Cited by 1,072
Seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors and heart function
Rockman, H. A., Koch, W. J., & Lefkowitz, R. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415206a · Cited by 938
Adverse consequences of high sympathetic nervous activity in the failing human heart
Kaye, D. M., Lefkovits, J., Jennings, G. L., Bergin, P., Broughton, A., & Esler, M. D. (1995) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00332-0 · Cited by 665
Metadata
- Authors
- Leimbach, W. N., Wallin, B. G., Victor, R. G., Aylward, P. E., Sundlöf, G., & Mark, A. L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1986-05
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 913-919
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2143540423
- Cited by
- 812
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct evidence from intraneural recordings for increased central sympathetic outflow in patients with heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.73.5.913
- The paper
- Leimbach, W. N., Wallin, B. G., Victor, R. G., Aylward, P. E., Sundlöf, G., & Mark, A. L. (1986). Direct evidence from intraneural recordings for increased central sympathetic outflow in patients with heart failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.73.5.913
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.