The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monophasic action potential mapping in human subjects with normal electrocardiograms: direct evidence for the genesis of the T wave.
Open accessAbstract
T wave concordance in the normal human electrocardiogram (ECG) generally is explained by assuming opposite directions of ventricular depolarization and repolarization; however, direct experimental evidence for this hypothesis is lacking. We used a contact electrode catheter to record monophasic action potentials (MAPs) from 54 left ventricular endocardial sites during cardiac catheterization (seven patients) and a new contact electrode probe to record MAPs from 23 epicardial sites during cardiac surgery (three patients). All patients had normal left ventricular function and ECGs with concordant T waves. MAP recordings during constant sinus rhythm or right atrial pacing were analyzed for activation time (AT) = earliest QRS deflection to MAP upstroke, action potential duration (APD) = MAP upstroke to 90% repolarization, and repolarization time (RT) = AT plus APD. AT and APD varied by 32 and 64 msec, respectively, over the left ventricular endocardium and by 55 and 73 msec, respectively, over the left ventricular epicardium. On a regional basis, the diaphragmatic and apicoseptal endocardium had the shortest AT and the longest APD, and the anteroapical and posterolateral endocardium had the longest AT and the shortest APD (p less than .05 to less than .0001). RT was less heterogeneous than APD, and no significant transventricular gradients of RT were found. In percent of the simultaneously recorded QT interval, epicardial RT ranged from 70.8 to 87.4 (mean 80.7 +/- 3.9) and endocardial RT ranged from 80 to 97.8 (mean 87.1 +/- 4.4) (p less than .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The long QT syndromes: A critical review, new clinical observations and a unifying hypothesis
Jackman, W. M., Friday, K. J., Anderson, J. L., Aliot, E. M., Clark, M., & Lazzara, R. (1988) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/0033-0620(88)90014-x · Cited by 783
Cardiac electrophysiology in mice: a matter of size
Kaese, S., & Verheule, S. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00345 · Cited by 196
BROCKMEIER, K., SCHMITZ, L., CHAVEZ, J. D. J. B., BURGHOFF, M., KOCH, H., ZIMMERMANN, R., & TRAHMS, L. (1997) · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb01824.x · Cited by 99
Ventricular repolarization measures for arrhythmic risk stratification
Monitillo, F. (2016) · World Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.4330/wjc.v8.i1.57 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Franz, M. R., Bargheer, K., Rafflenbeul, W., Haverich, A., & Lichtlen, P. R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-386
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2047838671
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monophasic action potential mapping in human subjects with normal electrocardiograms: direct evidence for the genesis of the T wave. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.75.2.379
- The paper
- Franz, M. R., Bargheer, K., Rafflenbeul, W., Haverich, A., & Lichtlen, P. R. (1987). Monophasic action potential mapping in human subjects with normal electrocardiograms: direct evidence for the genesis of the T wave. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.75.2.379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.