Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experimental congestive heart failure produced by rapid ventricular pacing in the dog: cardiac effects.

Open access
Wilson, J R, Douglas, P, Hickey, W F, Lanoce, V, Ferraro, N, Muhammad, A, Reichek, N·1987·Circulation

Abstract

Chronic rapid ventricular pacing in the dog reportedly produces a useful preparation of low-output heart failure. However, little information is available regarding cardiac changes in this preparation. Accordingly, we evaluated the effects of both short-term (3 weeks) and prolonged (2 months) rapid ventricular pacing on cardiac hemodynamics, mass, and chamber size. The effects of short-term pacing on left ventricular wall thickening, blood flow, and metabolism were also examined. Compared with 16 control dogs, dogs paced for either 3 weeks (n = 8) or 2 months (n = 13) exhibited reduced cardiac outputs (control 130 +/- 20 ml/min/kg, 3 week pacing 112 +/- 19 ml/min/kg, 2 month pacing 116 +/- 14 ml/min/kg) and elevated pulmonary wedge pressures (control 10 +/- 3 mm Hg, 3 week pacing 26 +/- 5 mm Hg, 2 month pacing 26 +/- 8 mm Hg) and right atrial pressures (control 4 +/- 1 mm Hg, 3 week pacing 13 +/- 3 mm Hg, 2 month pacing 9 +/- 3 mm Hg) (all p less than .01 vs control). At the postmortem examination, both groups of paced dogs also exhibited increased left ventricular volumes (control 13 +/- 6 ml, 3 week pacing 27 +/- 6 ml, 2 month pacing 26 +/- 8 ml), right ventricular volumes (control 13 +/- 5 ml, 3 week pacing 27 +/- 9, 2 month pacing 24 +/- 7 ml), and right ventricular mass (control 27 +/- 5 g, 3 week pacing 32 +/- 6 g, 2 month pacing 34 +/- 6 g) (all p less than .03 vs control) but had normal left ventricular mass. Three weeks of pacing also decreased percent left ventricular shortening (34 +/- 6% to 17 +/- 7%) associated with a disproportionate deterioration of posterior wall thickening (58 +/- 16% to 17 +/- 18%) (both p less than .01), as assessed by echocardiography. This left ventricular dysfunction was associated with no change in myocardial lactate extraction (prepacing 40 +/- 10%, 3 week pacing 36 +/- 10%), myocardial arteriovenous O2 difference, or myocardial histology, suggesting that it was not due to myocardial ischemia. These data indicate that rapid ventricular pacing in the dog produces a useful experimental preparation of low-output heart failure characterized by biventricular pump dysfunction, biventricular cardiac dilation, and nonischemic impairment of left ventricular contractility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.75.4.857

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, J. R., Douglas, P., Hickey, W. F., Lanoce, V, Ferraro, N., Muhammad, A., & Reichek, N.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1987-04
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
857-867
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2001792324
Cited by
303
References
0
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental congestive heart failure produced by rapid ventricular pacing in the dog: cardiac effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.75.4.857
The paper
Wilson, J. R., Douglas, P., Hickey, W. F., Lanoce, V, Ferraro, N., Muhammad, A., & Reichek, N. (1987). Experimental congestive heart failure produced by rapid ventricular pacing in the dog: cardiac effects. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.75.4.857

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.