The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Duplex scanning for diagnosis of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal disease: a prospective study.
Abstract
We compared ultrasonic duplex scanning and angiography for the localization and classification of arterial stenoses and occlusions in 32 patients. The criteria for the detection of a greater than 50% diameter reducing stenosis was an increase in peak systolic velocity of greater than 100%, loss of reverse flow, and spectral broadening. Duplex studies and angiograms were evaluated in a blinded fashion. The agreement between duplex scanning and angiography for the 383 arterial segments studied was not significantly different than the previously reported agreement between two different radiologists reading the same angiograms (kappa of 0.55 vs 0.63). For detecting stenoses that were greater than 50% diameter reducing by angiography, duplex scanning had a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 80%, and a negative predictive value of 93%. These results are as good as previously reported comparisons between two different radiologists' readings of the same angiograms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weitz, J. I., Byrne, J., Clagett, G. P., Farkouh, M. E., Porter, J. M., Sackett, D. L., Strandness, D. E., & Taylor, L. M. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.11.3026 · Cited by 889
Self-citationAtherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group III: Pathophysiology
Faxon, D. P., Fuster, V., Libby, P., Beckman, J. A., Hiatt, W. R., Thompson, R. W., Topper, J. N., Annex, B. H., Rundback, J. H., Fabunmi, R. P., et al. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000128520.37674.ef · Cited by 414
Peripheral Artery Disease: Current Insight Into the Disease and Its Diagnosis and Management
Olin, J. W., & Sealove, B. A. (2010) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0133 · Cited by 349
Duplex ultrasound measurement of postprandial intestinal blood flow: Effect of meal composition
Moneta, G. L., Taylor, D. C., Helton, W. S., Mulholland, M. W., & Strandness, D. E. (1988) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(88)90364-2 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohler, T. R., Nance, D. R., Cramer, M. M., Vandenburghe, N., & Strandness, D. E.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1074-1080
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2008818767
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Duplex scanning for diagnosis of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal disease: a prospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.76.5.1074
- The paper
- Kohler, T. R., Nance, D. R., Cramer, M. M., Vandenburghe, N., & Strandness, D. E. (1987). Duplex scanning for diagnosis of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal disease: a prospective study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.76.5.1074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
