The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reperfusion injury and its pharmacologic modification.
Open accessAbstract
Reperfusion injury includes a spectrum of events, such as reperfusion arrhythmias, vascular damage and no-reflow, and myocardial functional stunning. The concept of reperfusion injury remains controversial with many proposed mechanisms when applied to humans, whereas in animal models, there are two main proposed mechanisms: calcium over-load and formation of oxygen free radicals. To prove that reperfusion injury is specifically caused by reperfusion would require evidence that an intervention given at the time of reperfusion can diminish or abolish the injury as in the case of arrhythmias, which are thought to be mediated by excess recycling of cytosolic calcium with delayed afterdepolarizations and ventricular automaticity. In the case of myocardial stunning, the phenomenon may be mediated, at least in part, by a burst of free radicals formed within the first minute of reperfusion and improved by free radical scavengers given at the time of reperfusion. The alternate hypothesis is that cytosolic calcium overload damages mechanisms for normal intracellular calcium regulation so that the stunned myocardium responds to agents that are thought to increase intracellular cytosolic calcium, such as beta-receptor agonists. A further component of reperfusion injury, under active investigation, is microvascular damage with alterations at the level of platelets, leukocytes, and endothelial integrity. From the therapeutic point of view, the divergent results of experimental interventions and the possibility that the abrupt onset of reperfusion in animals differs from the situation in humans with thrombolysis means that the best way currently available to limit reperfusion injury is by minimizing the ischemic period by early reperfusion and by optimizing the metabolic status of the ischemic myocardium at the end of the ischemic period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xanthine oxidase as a source of free radical damage in myocardial ischemia
CHAMBERS, D., PARKS, D., PATTERSON, G., ROY, R., MCCORD, J., YOSHIDA, S., PARMLEY, L., & DOWNEY, J. (1985) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2828(85)80017-1 · Cited by 672
Cited by
Myocardial No-Reflow in Humans
Niccoli, G., Burzotta, F., Galiuto, L., & Crea, F. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.054 · Cited by 853
Exercise Provides Direct Biphasic Cardioprotection via Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Activation
Yamashita, N., Hoshida, S., Otsu, K., Asahi, M., Kuzuya, T., & Hori, M. (1999) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.189.11.1699 · Cited by 371
Oxygen-derived free radicals and myocardial reperfusion injury: An overview
Bolli, R. (1991) · Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy · doi:10.1007/bf00054747 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Opie, L. H.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1049-1062
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2022330306
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reperfusion injury and its pharmacologic modification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.80.4.1049
- The paper
- Opie, L. H. (1989). Reperfusion injury and its pharmacologic modification. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.80.4.1049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.