The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy.
Open accessAbstract
Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using direct-current defibrillator discharges requires general anesthesia and may have serious side effects. Sixteen patients with drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia underwent catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency energy. A standard 7F quadripolar electrode catheter was positioned to record the largest unipolar His potential (580 +/- 640 microV) from the distal electrode. An electrocoagulator (Microvasive Bicap 4005) supplied continuous, unmodulated energy at 550 kHz. One to 14 applications of radiofrequency current were delivered between the distal electrode and a large-diameter chest wall electrode. Transient, mild chest discomfort was reported by seven of 16 patients. None had significant arrhythmias or blood pressure changes during radiofrequency ablation. Complete atrioventricular block was produced in nine of 16 patients and high-grade second-degree atrioventricular block was produced in one patient with radiofrequency current. Attenuated His bundle electrograms could still be recorded in the remaining six patients, four of whom underwent successful atrioventricular junctional ablation using direct-current shock during the same session. Atrioventricular block persisted in all 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation during a mean follow-up of 4.2 months. Compared with a group of historic control subjects treated with direct-current shock ablation, the 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency current had significantly less creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme release (5.7 +/- 5.1 vs. 22 +/- 13 IU, p = 0.006). A junctional escape rhythm was present in all patients after radiofrequency-induced atrioventricular block. In contrast, three of 10 control patients had an idioventricular escape after direct current shock ablation, and four patients had no escape rhythm at all.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities
Epstein, A. E., DiMarco, J. P., Ellenbogen, K. A., Estes, N. A. M., Freedman, R. A., Gettes, L. S., Gillinov, A. M., Gregoratos, G., Hammill, S. C., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.032 · Cited by 2,546
Jackman, W. M., Wang, X., Friday, K. J., Roman, C. A., Moulton, K. P., Beckman, K. J., McClelland, J. H., Twidale, N., Hazlitt, H. A., Prior, M. I., et al. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199106063242301 · Cited by 1,422
GEELEN, P., BRUGADA, J., ANDRIES, E., & BRUGADA, P. (1997) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06179.x · Cited by 168
Edner, M., Caidahl, K., Bergfeldt, L., Darpo, B., Edvardsson, N., & Rosenqvist, M. (1995) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.74.3.261 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Langberg, J. J., Chin, M. C., Rosenqvist, M., Cockrell, J., Dullet, N., Van Hare, G., Griffin, J. C., & Scheinman, M. M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1527-1535
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2000182042
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.80.6.1527
- The paper
- Langberg, J. J., Chin, M. C., Rosenqvist, M., Cockrell, J., Dullet, N., Van Hare, G., Griffin, J. C., & Scheinman, M. M. (1989). Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.80.6.1527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.