The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carotid sinus baroreceptor sensitivity in experimental heart failure.
Abstract
Single-unit carotid sinus baroreceptor activity was recorded in normal and heart-failure (pacing-induced) dogs. The sensitivity of these units was compared between the two groups of dogs. After development of clinical heart failure, the animals were anesthetized, and the left carotid sinus was vascularly isolated and perfused with oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit solution. Single-unit baroreceptor discharge was recorded from the carotid sinus nerve in response to stepwise increases in carotid sinus pressure (CSP). In addition, the carotid sinus diameter was measured with sonomicrometer crystals. In this way, both CSP-discharge and CSP-diameter curves were constructed for both normal and heart-failure dogs. Analysis of these curves demonstrated that the heart-failure group exhibited a significant decrease in peak discharge (48.1 +/- 3.0 vs. 22.2 +/- 2.2 spikes/sec; p less than 0.001) and a significant elevation in threshold pressure compared with the normal animals (91.0 +/- 5.0 vs. 119.1 +/- 4.4 mm Hg; p less than 0.001). The peak slope of the CSP-discharge curve was also significantly lower in the heart-failure group (0.63 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.40 +/- 0.09 spikes/sec/mm Hg; p less than 0.05). In the heart-failure group, perfusion of the carotid sinus with ouabain (0.01 micrograms/ml) caused a significant decrease in threshold pressure and a significant increase in peak discharge frequency, as well as an increase in slope of the CSP-discharge curve. There were no changes in CSP-diameter relations in response to ouabain. This dose of ouabain had no effect on pressure-discharge relations or carotid sinus diameters in normal dogs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellular mechanism of action of cardiac glycosides
Fozzard, H. A., & Sheets, M. F. (1985) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80458-7 · Cited by 72
Cited by
Imai, K., Sato, H., Hori, M., Kusuoka, H., Ozaki, H., Yokoyama, H., Takeda, H., Inoue, M., & Kamada, T. (1994) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(94)90150-3 · Cited by 991
The Autonomic Nervous System and Heart Failure
Florea, V. G., & Cohn, J. N. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.114.302589 · Cited by 572
Autonomic Nervous System and Immune System Interactions
Kenney, M. J., & Ganta, C. K. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c130051 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W., Chen, J. S., & Zucker, I. H.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1959-1966
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2071947027
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carotid sinus baroreceptor sensitivity in experimental heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.81.6.1959
- The paper
- Wang, W., Chen, J. S., & Zucker, I. H. (1990). Carotid sinus baroreceptor sensitivity in experimental heart failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.81.6.1959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.