The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Echocardiographic detection of coronary artery disease during dobutamine infusion.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional echocardiography performed during dobutamine infusion has been proposed as a potentially useful method for detecting coronary artery disease. However, the safety and diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography has not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, echocardiograms were recorded during step-wise infusion of dobutamine to a maximum dose of 30 micrograms/kg/min in 103 patients who also underwent quantitative coronary angiography. The echocardiograms were digitally stored and displayed in a format that allowed simultaneous analysis of rest and stress images. Development of a new abnormality in regional function was used as an early end point for the dobutamine infusion. No patient had a symptomatic arrhythmia or complications from stress-induced ischemia. Significant coronary artery disease (greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis) was present in 35 of 55 patients who had normal echocardiograms at rest. The sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities for coronary artery disease was 89% (31 of 35) and 85% (17 of 20), respectively. The sensitivity was 81% (17 of 21) in those with one-vessel disease and 100% (14 of 14) in those with multivessel or left main disease. Forty-one of 48 patients with abnormal echocardiograms at baseline had localized rest wall motion abnormalities. Fifteen had coronary artery disease confined to regions that had abnormal rest wall motion, and 26 had disease remote from these regions. Thirteen of 15 patients (87%) without remote disease did not develop remote stress-induced abnormalities, and 21 of 26 (81%) who had remote disease developed corresponding abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography combined with dobutamine infusion is a safe and accurate method for detecting coronary artery disease and for predicting the extent of disease in those who have localized rest wall motion abnormalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fleisher, L. A., Beckman, J. A., Brown, K. A., Calkins, H., Chaikof, E. L., Fleischmann, K. E., Freeman, W. K., Froehlich, J. B., Kasper, E. K., Kersten, J. R., et al. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.185699 · Cited by 587
CHEITLIN, M., ARMSTRONG, W., AURIGEMMA, G., BELLER, G., BIERMAN, F., DAVIS, J., DOUGLAS, P., FAXON, D., GILLAM, L., & KIMBALL, T. (2003) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/s0894-7317(03)00685-0 · Cited by 107
Self-citationHänninen, H., Takala, P., Mäkijärvi, M., Montonen, J., Korhonen, P., Oikarinen, L., Nenonen, J., Katila, T., & Toivonen, L. (2000) · Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology · doi:10.1111/j.1542-474x.2000.tb00380.x · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawada, S. G., Segar, D. S., Ryan, T., Brown, S. E., Dohan, A. M., Williams, R., Fineberg, N. S., Armstrong, W. F., & Feigenbaum, H.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1605-1614
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2011134018
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Echocardiographic detection of coronary artery disease during dobutamine infusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.83.5.1605
- The paper
- Sawada, S. G., Segar, D. S., Ryan, T., Brown, S. E., Dohan, A. M., Williams, R., Fineberg, N. S., Armstrong, W. F., & Feigenbaum, H. (1991). Echocardiographic detection of coronary artery disease during dobutamine infusion. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.83.5.1605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.