Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 539

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Five- to fifteen-year follow-up after Fontan operation.

Open access
Driscoll, D J, Offord, K P, Feldt, R H, Schaff, H V, Puga, F J, Danielson, G K·1992·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to estimate survival and quality of outcome and assess factors associated with outcome for patients out 5 to 15 years from their Fontan operation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 352 patients who had the Fontan operation prior to 1985. The overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 77%, 70%, and 60%, respectively. The following factors were significantly associated with lower survival: univentricular heart or complex congenital anomalies other than tricuspid atresia, early calendar year of operation, heterotaxia syndromes, early age at operation, increased pulmonary artery pressure, atrioventricular valve dysfunction, and higher (worse) New York Heart Association class. Reoperations were necessary for 103 of the 352 patients. At least 20% of the survivors have or have had cardiac arrhythmias requiring antiarrhythmic medication or mechanical pacemaker insertion. Between 7% and 10% of the patients have had or had protein-losing enteropathy/hypoproteinemia. At 5 years postoperatively, 122 patients (34.7%) were alive with a better New York Heart Association functional classification than preoperatively. Fifty-eight patients (16.5%) were alive and in the same functional classification, but 126 (35.8%) died within the first 5 years or were in a worse functional classification. Thirty-nine patients were doing excellently and 29 patients poorly 5 years after the operation. Of the surviving patients, 43% can do as much exercise as their peers, whereas 3% are incapable of exercise. CONCLUSIONS: To assure good functional long-term outcome in addition to survival, clinicians must exclude from selection for Fontan operation patients known to be at high risk for death or poor outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.85.2.469

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 539

Metadata

Authors
Driscoll, D. J., Offord, K. P., Feldt, R. H., Schaff, H. V., Puga, F. J., & Danielson, G. K.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1992-02
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
469-496
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2043305690
Cited by
539
References
1
FWCI
14.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Five- to fifteen-year follow-up after Fontan operation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.85.2.469
The paper
Driscoll, D. J., Offord, K. P., Feldt, R. H., Schaff, H. V., Puga, F. J., & Danielson, G. K. (1992). Five- to fifteen-year follow-up after Fontan operation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.85.2.469

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.