Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 500

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The ability of several short-term measures of RR variability to predict mortality after myocardial infarction.

Bigger, J T, Fleiss, J L, Rolnitzky, L M, Steinman, R C·1993·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We studied 715 patients 2 weeks after myocardial infarction to test the hypothesis that short-term power spectral measures of RR variability (calculated from 2 to 15 minutes of normal RR interval data) will predict all-cause mortality or arrhythmic death. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed power spectral analyses on the entire 24-hour RR interval time series. To compare with the 24-hour analyses, we selected short segments of ECG recordings from two time periods for analysis: 8 AM to 4 PM and midnight to 5 AM. The former corresponds to the time interval during which short-term measures of RR variability would most likely be obtained. The latter, during sleep, represent a period of increased vagal tone, which may simulate the conditions that exist when patients have a signal-averaged ECG recorded, ie, lying quietly in the laboratory. Four frequency domain measures were calculated from spectral analysis of heart period data over a 24-hour interval. We computed the 24-hour power spectral density and calculated the power within three frequency bands: (1) 0.0033 to < 0.04 Hz, very low frequency power, (2) 0.04 to < 0.15 Hz, low frequency power, and (3) 0.15 to 0.40 Hz, high frequency power. In addition, we calculated the ratio of low to high frequency power. These measures were calculated for 15-, 10-, 5-, and 2-minute segments during the day and at night. Mean power spectral values from short periods during the day and night were similar to 24-hour values, and the correlations between short segment values and 24-hour values were strong (many correlations were > or = 0.75). Using the optimal cutpoints determined previously for the 24-hour power spectral values, we compared the survival experience of patients with low values for RR variability in short segments of ECG recordings to those with high values. We found that power spectral measures of RR variability were excellent predictors of all-cause, cardiac, and arrhythmic mortality and sudden death. Patients with low values were 2 to 4 times as likely to die over an average follow-up of 31 months as were patients with high values. The power spectral measures of RR variability did not predict arrhythmic or sudden deaths substantially better than all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Power spectral measures of RR variability calculated from short (2 to 15 minutes) ECG recordings are remarkably similar to those calculated over 24 hours. The power spectral measures of RR variability are excellent predictors of all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.927

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 500

Metadata

Authors
Bigger, J. T., Fleiss, J. L., Rolnitzky, L. M., & Steinman, R. C.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1993-09
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
927-934
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2050057188
Cited by
500
References
0
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ability of several short-term measures of RR variability to predict mortality after myocardial infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.88.3.927
The paper
Bigger, J. T., Fleiss, J. L., Rolnitzky, L. M., & Steinman, R. C. (1993). The ability of several short-term measures of RR variability to predict mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.3.927

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.