Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differences in the electrophysiological response of canine ventricular epicardium and endocardium to ischemia. Role of the transient outward current.

Open access
Lukas, A, Antzelevitch, C·1993·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemia is known to produce more severe electrophysiological disturbances in canine ventricular epicardium than endocardium, although the mechanism for the differential sensitivity is still unresolved. Recent studies have demonstrated the presence of a prominent transient outward current (Ito) in ventricular epicardium but not endocardium. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that the differential sensitivity of these two tissues to ischemia results, at least in part, from a more prominent Ito in epicardium than in endocardium. METHODS AND RESULTS: Isolated canine ventricular epicardial and endocardial tissues and myocytes were studied by standard microelectrode techniques. Simulated ischemia (hyperkalemia, hypoxia, and acidosis) abolished the action potential plateau and caused a 50% to 60% shortening of action potential duration in epicardium but only a 10% to 20% shortening in endocardium. 4-Aminopyridine, an Ito inhibitor, restored the plateau in epicardium and reduced the dispersion of action potential duration between epicardium and endocardium. Stimulation protocols that minimized the contribution of Ito, such as acceleration of the stimulation rate or introduction of early premature beats, produced a paradoxical prolongation of the epicardial response caused by restoration of the action potential dome. Thus, ischemia-induced dispersion of repolarization was greatly diminished at rapid rates and after premature beats. Similar results were obtained in tissues and myocytes obtained from the same myocardial layers, suggesting that the differential sensitivities of epicardium and endocardium to ischemia are largely a result of inherent differences in cellular properties. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the presence of a prominent Ito in epicardium but not endocardium contributes importantly to the selective electrical depression of epicardium by simulated ischemia. The repolarizing influence of Ito serves to amplify the ischemia-induced changes in inward (ICa and INa) and outward (calcium-activated) currents. By facilitating loss of the dome in epicardium, Ito contributes to the development of a marked dispersion of repolarization between normal and ischemic epicardium and between epicardium and endocardium, thereby providing the electrophysiological substrate for the genesis of reentrant arrhythmias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2903

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Lukas, A., & Antzelevitch, C.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1993-12
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
2903-2915
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2028300810
Cited by
274
References
12
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in the electrophysiological response of canine ventricular epicardium and endocardium to ischemia. Role of the transient outward current. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2903
The paper
Lukas, A., & Antzelevitch, C. (1993). Differences in the electrophysiological response of canine ventricular epicardium and endocardium to ischemia. Role of the transient outward current. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2903

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.