Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 399

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty).

Open access
Ryan, T J, Bauman, W B, Kennedy, J W, Kereiakes, D J, King, S B, McCallister, B D, Smith, S C, Ullyot, D J·1993·Circulation

Abstract

"The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures was formed to gather information and make recommendations about appropriate use of technology in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. Coronary angioplasty is one such important technique. We are currently witnessing an extraordinary expansion of the use of coronary angioplasty as an alternative means of achieving myocardial revascularization. An estimated 300 000 angioplasty procedures were performed in the United States in 1990, a more than tenfold increase over the past decade.1 Such growth is attributable not only to demonstrated clinical benefit but also to continuing technical advances that have led to improved techniques and higher success rates over time. There was some concomitant broadening of the indications for both coronary angiography and angioplasty, which led the task force to promulgate guidelines for coronary angiography in 19872 and guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in 1988.3 In view of the continuing advances and expanding role of interventional cardiology in clinical practice today, it was recommended that this committee review current indications and procedures governing the performance of angioplasty in the United States and determine whether any alterations in the previously published guidelines are warranted. Such a review was anticipated and recommended in the original committee report.3 This document presents the summary opinion of the reconvened committee with its newly constituted membership."

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2987

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 399

Metadata

Authors
Ryan, T. J., Bauman, W. B., Kennedy, J. W., Kereiakes, D. J., King, S. B., McCallister, B. D., Smith, S. C., & Ullyot, D. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1993-12
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
2987-3007
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1997588813
Cited by
399
References
0
FWCI
14.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2987
The paper
Ryan, T. J., Bauman, W. B., Kennedy, J. W., Kereiakes, D. J., King, S. B., McCallister, B. D., Smith, S. C., & Ullyot, D. J. (1993). Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2987

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.