Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation Among Stenosis Severity, Myocardial Blood Flow, and Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Di Carli, Marcelo, Czernin, Johannes, Hoh, Carl K., Gerbaudo, Victor H., Brunken, Richard C., Huang, Sung-Chen, Phelps, Michael E., Schelbert, Heinrich R.·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background Coronary arteriography is considered the “gold standard” for evaluating the severity of a coronary stenosis. Because the resistance to blood flow through a stenotic lesion depends on a number of lesion characteristics, the physiological significance of coronary lesions of intermediate severity is often difficult to determine from angiography alone. This study of patients with coronary artery disease seeks to determine the relation between myocardial blood flow and flow reserve measured by positron emission tomography (PET) and the percent area stenosis on quantitative coronary arteriography. Methods and Results We studied 28 subjects: 18 patients with coronary artery disease (66±8 years) and 10 age-matched healthy volunteers (64±13 years) with dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging at rest and after dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg). The percent cross-sectional area stenosis was quantified on the coronary arteriograms as described by Brown et al. In the 18 patients, a total of 41 non–infarct-related coronary vessels were analyzed. Myocardial blood flows in normal regions of patients with coronary artery disease were not different than those in healthy volunteers, both at rest and after dipyridamole. As a result, the myocardial flow reserve was also similar in both groups (2.4±0.4 versus 2.6±0.7, respectively; P =NS). Quantitative PET estimates of hyperemic blood flow ( r =.81, P <.00001), flow reserve ( r =.78, P <.00001), and an index of the “minimal coronary resistance” ( r =.78, P <.00001) were inversely and nonlinearly correlated with the percent area stenosis on angiography. Of note, PET estimates of myocardial flow reserve successfully differentiated coronary lesions of intermediate severity (50% to 70% and 70% to 90%; 2.4±0.4 versus 1.8±0.5, respectively; P =.04). Conclusions In patients with coronary artery disease, noninvasive measurements of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve by PET are inversely and nonlinearly related to stenosis severity as defined by quantitative angiography. Importantly, coronary lesions of intermediate severity have a differential flow reserve that decreases as stenosis increases that can be detected noninvasively by PET, thus allowing better definition of the functional importance of known coronary stenosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1944

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Di Carli, M., Czernin, J., Hoh, C. K., Gerbaudo, V. H., Brunken, R. C., Huang, S.-C., Phelps, M. E., & Schelbert, H. R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-04
Volume
91
Issue
7
Pages
1944-1951
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1998868705
Cited by
372
References
1
FWCI
11.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation Among Stenosis Severity, Myocardial Blood Flow, and Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1944
The paper
Di Carli, M., Czernin, J., Hoh, C. K., Gerbaudo, V. H., Brunken, R. C., Huang, S.-C., Phelps, M. E., & Schelbert, H. R. (1995). Relation Among Stenosis Severity, Myocardial Blood Flow, and Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1944

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.