Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 471

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantitative Relation Between Myocardial Viability and Improvement in Heart Failure Symptoms After Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Di Carli, Marcelo F., Asgarzadie, Farbod, Schelbert, Heinrich R., Brunken, Richard C., Laks, Hillel, Phelps, Michael E., Maddahi, Jamshid·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background Studies of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction have shown that preoperative quantification of myocardial viability may be clinically useful to identify those patients who will benefit most from revascularization both functionally and prognostically. However, the relation between preoperative extent of viability and change in heart failure symptoms has not been documented carefully. We assessed the relation between the magnitude of improvement in heart failure symptoms after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and the extent of myocardial viability as assessed by use of quantitative analysis of preoperative positron emission tomography (PET) images. Methods and Results We studied 36 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 28±6%) undergoing CABG. Preoperative extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities and myocardial viability (flow-metabolism mismatch) were assessed by use of quantitative analysis of PET images with 13 N ammonia and fluorine-18-deoxyglucose. Each patient’s functional status was determined before and after CABG by use of a Specific Activity Scale. Mean perfusion defect size and severity were 63±13% and 33±12%, respectively. Total extent of a PET mismatch correlated linearly and significantly with percent improvement in functional status after CABG ( r =.87, P <.0001). A blood flow–metabolism mismatch ≥18% was associated with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 78% for predicting a change in functional status after revascularization. Patients with large mismatches (≥18%) achieved a significantly higher functional status compared with those with minimal or no PET mismatch (<5%) (5.7±0.8 versus 4.9±0.7 metabolic equivalents, P =.009). This resulted in an improvement of 107% in patients with large mismatches compared with only 34% in patients with minimal or no PET mismatch. Conclusions In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, the magnitude of improvement in heart failure symptoms after CABG is related to the preoperative extent and magnitude of myocardial viability as assessed by use of PET imaging. Patients with large perfusion-metabolism mismatches exhibit the greatest clinical benefit after CABG.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3436

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 471

Metadata

Authors
Di Carli, M. F., Asgarzadie, F., Schelbert, H. R., Brunken, R. C., Laks, H., Phelps, M. E., & Maddahi, J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-12-15
Volume
92
Issue
12
Pages
3436-3444
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2077998344
Cited by
471
References
0
FWCI
25.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Relation Between Myocardial Viability and Improvement in Heart Failure Symptoms After Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3436
The paper
Di Carli, M. F., Asgarzadie, F., Schelbert, H. R., Brunken, R. C., Laks, H., Phelps, M. E., & Maddahi, J. (1995). Quantitative Relation Between Myocardial Viability and Improvement in Heart Failure Symptoms After Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3436

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.