Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic Importance of Intimal Thickness as Measured by Intracoronary Ultrasound After Cardiac Transplantation

Rickenbacher, Peter R., Pinto, Fausto J., Lewis, Neil P., Hunt, Sharon A., Alderman, Edwin L., Schroeder, John S., Stinson, Edward B., Brown, Byron W., Valantine, Hannah A.·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background Although intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) has been validated for the early detection of transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD), the prognostic importance of findings detected by this new imaging technique is unknown. Methods and Results This study examined the relation of clinical outcome in 145 heart transplant recipients (mean age, 45.1±11.1 years) with the amount of intimal thickness measured by ICUS during routine annual coronary angiography 1 to 10 years (mean, 3.1±2.2 years) after transplantation. From published autopsy data, a mean intimal thickness of >0.3 mm was considered significant. During a mean follow-up time of 48.2±10.2 months, 23 deaths (12 cardiac) occurred, and 6 patients required retransplantation. Angiographic TxCAD developed in 22 of 125 patients (17.6%) in the subgroup with normal angiograms at the time of ICUS and a follow-up annual angiographic study. In the total population and the subgroup, mean intimal thicknesses of >0.3 and ≤0.3 mm, respectively, were associated with significantly inferior 4-year actuarial overall survival (73% versus 96%, P =.005; 72% versus 92%, P =.05), cardiac survival (79% versus 96%, P =.005; 80% versus 98%, P =.04), and freedom from cardiac death and retransplantation (74% versus 98%, P <.0001; 70% versus 96%, P =.001). In addition, ICUS predicted freedom from development of subsequent angiographic TxCAD in the subgroup that was initially normal (26% versus 72%, P =.02). A mean intimal thickness by ICUS of >0.3 mm was associated with inferior clinical outcome regardless of the presence of angiographic TxCAD and predicted the development of subsequent angiographic TxCAD. Despite significantly longer duration after transplantation, higher rejection incidence, and lower average daily cyclosporine dose, none of these covariates were independent risk factors for outcome. Conclusions These findings confirm the prognostic importance of mean intimal thickening of >0.3 mm in heart transplant recipients and suggest that these patients should be candidates for early interventional strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3445

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Rickenbacher, P. R., Pinto, F. J., Lewis, N. P., Hunt, S. A., Alderman, E. L., Schroeder, J. S., Stinson, E. B., Brown, B. W., & Valantine, H. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-12-15
Volume
92
Issue
12
Pages
3445-3452
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2115655550
Cited by
180
References
0
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Importance of Intimal Thickness as Measured by Intracoronary Ultrasound After Cardiac Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3445
The paper
Rickenbacher, P. R., Pinto, F. J., Lewis, N. P., Hunt, S. A., Alderman, E. L., Schroeder, J. S., Stinson, E. B., Brown, B. W., & Valantine, H. A. (1995). Prognostic Importance of Intimal Thickness as Measured by Intracoronary Ultrasound After Cardiac Transplantation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3445

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.