Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Study in Ventricular–Ventricular Interaction: Single Right Ventricles Compared With Systemic Right Ventricles in a Dual-Chamber Circulation

Fogel, Mark A., Weinberg, Paul M., Fellows, Kenneth E., Hoffman, Eric A.·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background Ventricular–ventricular interaction is known to occur in the normal human heart. To determine whether it plays a role in the function of single right ventricles, systemic right ventricles were compared with and without a left ventricle mechanically coupled to it. Methods and Results A noninvasive magnetic resonance tagging technique (spatial modulation of magnetization [SPAMM]) that lays intersecting stripes down on the myocardium was used to examine 18 patients with systemic right ventricles: 7 with a single right ventricle who have undergone the Fontan procedure (age, 38.8±8.9 months) and 11 with transposition of the great arteries who have undergone an atrial inversion operation (age, 16.3±3.9 years). The motion of the intersection points was tracked through systole to determine regional twist and radial shortening. Shortening rates also were evaluated. Finite strain analysis was applied to the grid lines using Delaunay triangulation, and the two-dimensional strain tensor and principal E1 strains were derived for the various anatomic regions. Basal and apical short-axis planes through the ventricular wall were categorized into four distinct regions spaced equally around the circumference of the slice. We observed the following results. (1) Strain was greatest and heterogeneity of strain was least in patients with transposition of the great arteries who were status post atrial inversion operation (six of eight regions). Marked differences were noted in the distribution of strain within a given region, from endocardium to epicardium, and from atrioventricular valve to apical plane between patient subtypes and those with a normal left ventricle. (2) Contrary to the normal subject studied by the use of the same method, for both patient subtypes, there was counterclockwise twist in one region, clockwise twist in the posterior or inferior wall, and a transition zone of no twist at which the two regions of twist met. Normal human adult left ventricles studied in short-axis twist uniformly counterclockwise as viewed from apex to base. (3) Radial inward motion was greatest in the superior wall of both types of systemic right ventricle. The inferior walls of Fontan patients and the posterior (ie, septal) walls of patients with transposition of the great arteries, status post atrial inversion, moved paradoxically in systole. The shortening rate at the atrioventricular valve of patients with transposition of the great arteries, status post atrial inversion, was significantly lower than at the apex or in Fontan patients. Conclusions Marked differences in regional wall motion and strain were demonstrated in systemic right ventricles, depending on whether a left ventricle was present to augment its function. Ventricular–ventricular interaction appears to play an important role in affecting the biomechanics of systemic right ventricles. These observations were markedly different from those in the normal systemic left ventricle. These techniques demonstrate tools with which we can begin to evaluate surgical outcomes using regional myocardial mechanics and may provide a clue to single right ventricle failure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.92.2.219

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Fogel, M. A., Weinberg, P. M., Fellows, K. E., & Hoffman, E. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-07-15
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
219-230
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2158101971
Cited by
159
References
0
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study in Ventricular–Ventricular Interaction: Single Right Ventricles Compared With Systemic Right Ventricles in a Dual-Chamber Circulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.92.2.219
The paper
Fogel, M. A., Weinberg, P. M., Fellows, K. E., & Hoffman, E. A. (1995). A Study in Ventricular–Ventricular Interaction: Single Right Ventricles Compared With Systemic Right Ventricles in a Dual-Chamber Circulation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.2.219

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.