Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Long-term Efficacy of Carvedilol in Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure

Krum, Henry, Sackner-Bernstein, Jonathan D., Goldsmith, Rochelle L., Kukin, Marrick L., Schwartz, Brian, Penn, Joshua, Medina, Norma, Yushak, Madeline, Horn, Evelyn, Katz, Stuart D., Levin, Howard R., Neuberg, Gerald W., DeLong, Greg, Packer, Milton·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background Clinical trials have shown that β-adrenergic blocking drugs are effective and well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate heart failure, but the utility and safety of these drugs in patients with advanced disease have not been evaluated. Methods and Results We enrolled 56 patients with severe chronic heart failure into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the vasodilating β-blocker carvedilol. All patients had advanced heart failure, as evidenced by a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.16±0.01 and a mean maximal oxygen consumption of 13.6±0.6 mL · kg−1· min−1 despite digitalis, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (if tolerated). After a 3-week, open-label, up-titration period, 49 of the 56 patients were assigned (in a double-blind fashion using a 2:1 randomization) to receive either carvedilol (25 mg BID, n=33) or matching placebo (n=16) for 14 weeks, while background therapy remained constant. Hemodynamic and functional variables were measured at the start and end of the study. Compared with the placebo group, patients in the carvedilol group showed improved cardiac performance, as reflected by an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (P=.005) and stroke volume index (P=.010) and a decrease in pulmonary wedge pressure, mean right atrial pressure, and systemic vascular resistance (P=.003, .002, and .017, respectively). In addition, compared with placebo, patients treated with carvedilol benefited clinically, as shown by an improvement in symptom scores (P=.002), functional class (P=.013), and submaximal exercise tolerance (P=.006). The combined risk of death, worsening heart failure, and life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia was lower in the carvedilol group than in the placebo group (P=.028), but carvedilol-treated patients had more dizziness and advanced heart block. Conclusions Carvedilol produces clinical and hemodynamic improvement in patients who have severe heart failure despite treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.92.6.1499

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Krum, H., Sackner-Bernstein, J. D., Goldsmith, R. L., Kukin, M. L., Schwartz, B., Penn, J., Medina, N., Yushak, M., Horn, E., Katz, S. D., Levin, H. R., Neuberg, G. W., DeLong, G., & Packer, M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-09-15
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
1499-1506
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2007424418
Cited by
374
References
33
FWCI
26.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Long-term Efficacy of Carvedilol in Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.92.6.1499
The paper
Krum, H., Sackner-Bernstein, J. D., Goldsmith, R. L., Kukin, M. L., Schwartz, B., Penn, J., Medina, N., Yushak, M., Horn, E., Katz, S. D., Levin, H. R., Neuberg, G. W., DeLong, G., & Packer, M. (1995). Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Long-term Efficacy of Carvedilol in Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.6.1499

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.