Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LDL-Apheresis Atherosclerosis Regression Study (LAARS): Effect of Aggressive Versus Conventional Lipid Lowering Treatment on Coronary Atherosclerosis

Open access
Kroon, Abraham A., Aengevaeren, Wim R.M., van der Werf, Tjeerd, Uijen, Gerard J.H., Reiber, Johan H.C., Bruschke, Albert V.G., Stalenhoef, Anton F.H.·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Intensive lipid lowering may retard the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. LDL-apheresis has the potential to decrease LDL cholesterol to very low levels. To assess the effect of more aggressive lipid lowering with LDL-apheresis, we set up a randomized study in men with hypercholesterolemia and severe coronary atherosclerosis. Methods and Results For 2 years, 42 men were treated with either biweekly LDL-apheresis plus medication or medication alone. In both groups a dose of simvastatin of 40 mg per day was administered. Baseline (mean±SD) LDL cholesterol was 7.8±1.9 mmol·L −1 and 7.9±2.3 mmol·L −1 in the apheresis and medication groups, respectively. The mean reduction in LDL cholesterol was 63% (to 3.0 mmol·L −1 ) and 47% (to 4.1 mmol·L −1 ), respectively. Primary quantitative coronary angiographic end points were changes in average mean segment diameter and minimal obstruction diameter. No differences between the apheresis and medication groups were found in mean segment diameter (−0.01±0.16 mm versus 0.03±0.16 mm, respectively) or in minimal obstruction diameter (−0.01±0.13 mm versus 0.01±0.11 mm, respectively), expressed as means per patient. On the basis of coronary segment, mean percent stenosis of all lesions showed a tendency to decrease; only in the apheresis group more minor lesions disappeared in comparison to the medication group. On bicycle exercise tests, the time to 0.1 mV ST-segment depression increased significantly by 39% and the maximum level of ST depression decreased significantly by 0.07 mV in the apheresis group versus no changes in the medication group. Conclusions Two years of lipid lowering both with medication alone or LDL-apheresis with medication showed angiographic arrest of the progression of coronary artery disease. However, more aggressive treatment induced functional improvement, which may precede anatomic changes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.93.10.1826

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Kroon, A. A., Aengevaeren, W. R. M., van der Werf, T., Uijen, G. J. H., Reiber, J. H. C., Bruschke, A. V. G., & Stalenhoef, A. F. H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-05-15
Volume
93
Issue
10
Pages
1826-1835
ISSN
  • 0009-7322
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1991899835
Cited by
275
References
53
FWCI
22.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LDL-Apheresis Atherosclerosis Regression Study (LAARS): Effect of Aggressive Versus Conventional Lipid Lowering Treatment on Coronary Atherosclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.93.10.1826
The paper
Kroon, A. A., Aengevaeren, W. R. M., van der Werf, T., Uijen, G. J. H., Reiber, J. H. C., Bruschke, A. V. G., & Stalenhoef, A. F. H. (1996). LDL-Apheresis Atherosclerosis Regression Study (LAARS): Effect of Aggressive Versus Conventional Lipid Lowering Treatment on Coronary Atherosclerosis. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.10.1826

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.