Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 605

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study: Relationship Between Exercise-Induced and Ambulatory Ischemia in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease

Stone, Peter H., Chaitman, Bernard R., McMahon, Robert P., Andrews, Thomas C., MacCallum, Gail, Sharaf, Barry, Frishman, William, Deanfield, John E., Sopko, George, Pratt, Craig, Goldberg, A. David, Rogers, William J., Hill, James, Proschan, Michael, Pepine, Carl J., Bourassa, Martial G., Conti, C. Richard·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background We investigated whether the presence and frequency of asymptomatic ischemic episodes recorded during ambulatory ECG (AECG) monitoring could be predicted on the basis of clinical characteristics or exercise treadmill test (ETT) performance in patients with stable coronary disease and whether the estimate of ischemia severity was similar between the AECG and ETT. Methods and Results Patients screened for the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study were selected for the current analysis if data were available from 48-hour AECG monitoring as well as from an ETT during which the patient developed ≥1-mm ST-segment depression. Exercise ECG data were available for 143 of the 910 patients without ischemic episodes and for 659 of the 910 patients with ischemic episodes during AECG monitoring. Angina was more frequent among patients with ambulatory ischemic episodes than among patients without such ischemia ( P <.001). Patients with AECG ischemia had a consistently more marked ischemic response on the ETT than patients without AECG ischemia; patients likely to have AECG ischemia could be predicted on the basis of ETT performance characteristics. However, the correlation coefficients between the severity of ischemia estimated by ETT and by AECG were small. Conclusions There are significant relations between ischemia detected by AECG monitoring and by ETT, but the relations are limited, indicating that the two tests are not redundant to characterize coronary patients. A larger study investigating the prognostic significance of the ischemia identified by each modality, with follow-up for clinical events, will be necessary to determine the most appropriate methods to evaluate patients with stable coronary disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.94.7.1537

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 605

Metadata

Authors
Stone, P. H., Chaitman, B. R., McMahon, R. P., Andrews, T. C., MacCallum, G., Sharaf, B., Frishman, W., Deanfield, J. E., Sopko, G., Pratt, C., Goldberg, A. D., Rogers, W. J., Hill, J., Proschan, M., Pepine, C. J., Bourassa, M. G., & Conti, C. R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-10
Volume
94
Issue
7
Pages
1537-1544
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2980486406
Cited by
605
References
2
FWCI
113.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study: Relationship Between Exercise-Induced and Ambulatory Ischemia in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.7.1537
The paper
Stone, P. H., Chaitman, B. R., McMahon, R. P., Andrews, T. C., MacCallum, G., Sharaf, B., Frishman, W., Deanfield, J. E., Sopko, G., Pratt, C., Goldberg, A. D., Rogers, W. J., Hill, J., Proschan, M., Pepine, C. J., Bourassa, M. G., & Conti, C. R. (1996). Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study: Relationship Between Exercise-Induced and Ambulatory Ischemia in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.7.1537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.