Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 628

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple Mechanisms in the Long-QT Syndrome: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Future Directions

Roden, Dan M., Lazzara, Ralph, Rosen, Michael, Schwartz, Peter J., Towbin, Jeffry, Vincent, G. Michael·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Abstract The congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is characterized by prolonged QT intervals, QT interval lability, and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. The manifestations of the disease vary, with a high incidence of sudden death in some affected families but not in others. Mutations causing LQTS have been identified in three genes, each encoding a cardiac ion channel. In families linked to chromosome 3, mutations in SCN5A, the gene encoding the human cardiac sodium channel, cause the disease. Mutations in the human ether-a`-go-go–related gene (HERG), which encodes a delayed-rectifier potassium channel, cause the disease in families linked to chromosome 7. Among affected individuals in families linked to chromosome 11, mutations have been identified in KVLQT1, a newly cloned gene that appears to encode a potassium channel. The SCN5A mutations result in defective sodium channel inactivation, whereas HERG mutations result in decreased outward potassium current. Either mutation would decrease net outward current during repolarization and would thereby account for prolonged QT intervals on the surface ECG. Preliminary data suggest that the clinical presentation in LQTS may be determined in part by the gene affected and possibly even by the specific mutation. The identification of disease genes in LQTS not only represents a major milestone in understanding the mechanisms underlying this disease but also presents new opportunities for combined research at the molecular, cellular, and clinical levels to understand issues such as adrenergic regulation of cardiac electrophysiology and mechanisms of susceptibility to arrhythmias in LQTS and other settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1996

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 628

Metadata

Authors
Roden, D. M., Lazzara, R., Rosen, M., Schwartz, P. J., Towbin, J., & Vincent, G. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-10-15
Volume
94
Issue
8
Pages
1996-2012
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1979924020
Cited by
628
References
2
FWCI
44.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Mechanisms in the Long-QT Syndrome: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1996
The paper
Roden, D. M., Lazzara, R., Rosen, M., Schwartz, P. J., Towbin, J., & Vincent, G. M. (1996). Multiple Mechanisms in the Long-QT Syndrome: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Future Directions. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.