Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early Versus Delayed Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Healing and Early Afterload Reducing Therapy Trial

Pfeffer, Marc A., Greaves, Sally C., Arnold, J. Malcolm O., Glynn, Robert J., LaMotte, Frances S., Lee, Richard T., Menapace, Francis J., Rapaport, Elliot, Ridker, Paul M., Rouleau, Jean-Lucien, Solomon, Scott D., Hennekens, Charles H.·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Background Although ACE inhibitor therapy has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), the optimal dose and the timing of its initiation have not been determined. Methods and Results In a double-blind trial of 352 patients with anterior MI, we compared the safety and effectiveness of early (day 1) versus delayed (day 14) initiation of the ACE inhibitor ramipril (10 mg) on echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) area and ejection fraction (EF). An early, low-dose ramipril (0.625 mg) arm was also evaluated. Clinical events did not differ. During the first 14 days, the risk of manifesting a systolic arterial pressure of ≤90 mm Hg was increased in both ramipril groups. LVEF increased in all groups during this period, but the early, full-dose ramipril group had the greatest improvement in EF (increase: full, 4.9±10.0; low, 3.9±8.2%; delayed, 2.4±8.8%; P for trend <.05) and was the only group that did not demonstrate a significant increase in LV diastolic area. Conclusions The results of the present study demonstrated that in patients with anterior MI, the early use of ramipril (titrated to 10 mg) attenuated LV remodeling and was associated with a prompter recovery of LVEF. The use of low-dose regimen did not prevent hypotension and had only intermediate benefits on LV size and function. The more favorable effects on LV topography of the early use of full-dose ramipril support the results of the major clinical trials, which have demonstrated an early survival benefit of ACE inhibition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.95.12.2643

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Pfeffer, M. A., Greaves, S. C., Arnold, J. M. O., Glynn, R. J., LaMotte, F. S., Lee, R. T., Menapace, F. J., Rapaport, E., Ridker, P. M., Rouleau, J.-L., Solomon, S. D., & Hennekens, C. H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-06-17
Volume
95
Issue
12
Pages
2643-2651
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2051837586
Cited by
208
References
1
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Versus Delayed Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Healing and Early Afterload Reducing Therapy Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.95.12.2643
The paper
Pfeffer, M. A., Greaves, S. C., Arnold, J. M. O., Glynn, R. J., LaMotte, F. S., Lee, R. T., Menapace, F. J., Rapaport, E., Ridker, P. M., Rouleau, J.-L., Solomon, S. D., & Hennekens, C. H. (1997). Early Versus Delayed Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Healing and Early Afterload Reducing Therapy Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.12.2643

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.