Estimation of Central Aortic Pressure Waveform by Mathematical Transformation of Radial Tonometry Pressure: Validation of Generalized Transfer Function
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Central aortic pressures and waveform convey important information about cardiovascular status, but direct measurements are invasive. Peripheral pressures can be measured noninvasively, and although they often differ substantially from central pressures, they may be mathematically transformed to approximate the latter. We tested this approach, examining intersubject and intrasubject variability and the validity of using a single averaged transformation, which would enhance its applicability. METHODS AND RESULTS: Invasive central aortic pressure by micromanometer and radial pressure by automated tonometry were measured in 20 patients at steady state and during hemodynamic transients (Valsalva maneuver, abdominal compression, nitroglycerin, or vena caval obstruction). For each patient, transfer functions (TFs) between aortic and radial pressures were calculated by parametric model and results averaged to yield individual TFs. A generalized TF was the average of individual functions. TFs varied among patients, with coefficients of variation for peak amplitude and frequency at peak amplitude of 24.9% and 16.9%, respectively. Intrapatient TF variance with altered loading (> 20% variation in peak amplitude) was observed in 28.5% of patients. Despite this, the generalized TF estimated central arterial pressures to < or = 0.2 +/- 3.8 mm Hg error, arterial compliance to 6 +/- 7% accuracy, and augmentation index to within -7% points (30 +/- 45% accuracy). Individual TFs were only marginally superior to the generalized TF for reconstructing central pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Central aortic pressures can be accurately estimated from radial tonometry with the use of a generalized TF. The reconstructed waveform can provide arterial compliance estimates but may underestimate the augmentation index because the latter requires greater fidelity reproduction of the wave contour.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Augmentation index was measured using a validated, commercially available system (SphygmoCor).
“The augmentation index was measured by using a validated, commercially available system (SphygmoCor; AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia) that employs the principle of applanation tonometry and appropriate acquisition and analysis software for noninvasive recording and analysis of the arterial pulse.”
From Smoking and caffeine have a synergistic detrimental effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflections (2004) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 1,307
- Authors
- Chen, C.-H., Nevo, E., Fetics, B., Pak, P. H., Yin, F. C. P., Maughan, W. L., & Kass, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1827-1836
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W3016405830
- Cited by
- 1,307
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag012249-04)
- National Institute on Aging (AG-12249)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Keywords
- central blood pressure, radial tonometry, transfer function, arterial compliance, augmentation index, non-invasive blood pressure measurement, Valsalva maneuver, nitroglycerin, arterial stiffness
- MeSH terms
- Abdomen, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Aorta, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Catheterization, Female, Nitroglycerin, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, Male, Manometry, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Pressure, Valsalva Maneuver, Vena Cava, Inferior, Radial Artery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review