Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 641

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Different Ventricular Pacing Sites in Patients With Severe Heart Failure: Results of an Acute Hemodynamic Study

Blanc, Jean-Jacques, Etienne, Yves, Gilard, Martine, Mansourati, Jacques, Munier, Stéphane, Boschat, Jacques, Benditt, David G., Lurie, Keith G.·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Background Multisite ventricular pacing has recently been proposed as an additional treatment for patients with severe congestive heart failure. To further assess the potential value of this technique, we compared the acute hemodynamic changes associated with pacing the right ventricular apex (RVA) or outflow tract (RVOT) alone, the left ventricle (LV) alone, or biventricular (BIV) pacing of the RVA and LV together. Methods and Results Acute hemodynamic findings were measured in 27 patients with severe heart failure despite optimal therapy and either first-degree AV block and/or an intraventricular conduction defect. In the 23 patients with a high pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (>15 mm Hg), data were collected after transvenous pacing at different ventricular sites in either the VDD mode (AV delay=100 ms) or the VVI mode in patients with atrial fibrillation (n=6). The mean baseline cardiac index was 1.82 L · min −1 · m −2 . Mean±SD baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) (118.5±15.2 mm Hg), PCWP (26.4±6.6 mm Hg), and V-wave amplitude (39.1±14.6 mm Hg) were similar before and after either RVA or RVOT pacing. In contrast, LV-based pacing (either LV alone or BIV pacing) resulted in higher SBP ( P <.03) and lower PCWP ( P <.01) and V-wave amplitude ( P <.001) than either baseline or RV pacing measurements. With LV pacing alone, SBP, PCWP, and V waves were 126.5±15.1, 20.7±5.9, and 25.5±8.1 mm Hg, respectively. The results with LV pacing alone were similar to those obtained with BIV pacing. Conclusions In patients with severe congestive heart failure, both LV pacing alone and BIV pacing resulted in a similar and significant acute improvement in SBP, PCWP, and V-wave amplitude compared with baseline measurements and RV pacing alone. These results provide a strong basis for initiating long-term studies examining the chronic effects of LV-based pacing in patients with medically refractory congestive heart failure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3273

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 641

Metadata

Authors
Blanc, J.-J., Etienne, Y., Gilard, M., Mansourati, J., Munier, S., Boschat, J., Benditt, D. G., & Lurie, K. G.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-11-18
Volume
96
Issue
10
Pages
3273-3277
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2053172478
Cited by
641
References
0
FWCI
19.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Different Ventricular Pacing Sites in Patients With Severe Heart Failure: Results of an Acute Hemodynamic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3273
The paper
Blanc, J.-J., Etienne, Y., Gilard, M., Mansourati, J., Munier, S., Boschat, J., Benditt, D. G., & Lurie, K. G. (1997). Evaluation of Different Ventricular Pacing Sites in Patients With Severe Heart Failure: Results of an Acute Hemodynamic Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.