Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Integrated Mechanism for Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Leaflet Restriction Versus Coapting Force: In Vitro Studies

He, Shengqiu, Fontaine, Arnold A., Schwammenthal, Ehud, Yoganathan, Ajit P., Levine, Robert A.·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Background Functional mitral regurgitation in patients with ischemic or dilated ventricles has been related to competing factors: altered tension on the leaflets due to displacement of their papillary muscle and annular attachments, which restricts leaflet closure, versus global ventricular dysfunction with reduced transmitral pressure to close the leaflets. In vivo, however, geometric changes accompany dysfunction, making it difficult to study these factors independently. Functional mitral regurgitation also paradoxically decreases in midsystole, despite peak transmitral driving pressure, suggesting a change in the force balance acting to create a regurgitant orifice, with rising transmitral pressure counteracting forces that restrict leaflet closure. In vivo, this mechanism cannot be tested independently of annular contraction that could also reduce midsystolic regurgitation. Methods and Results An in vitro model was developed that allows independent variation of papillary muscle position, annular size, and transmitral pressure, with direct regurgitant flow rate measurement, to test the hypothesis that functional mitral regurgitation reflects an altered balance of forces acting on the leaflets. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements of excised porcine valves were made under physiological pressures and flows. Apical and posterolateral papillary muscle displacement caused decreased leaflet mobility and apical leaflet tethering or tenting with regurgitation, as seen clinically. It reproduced the clinically observed midsystolic decrease in regurgitant flow and orifice area as transmitral pressure increased. Tethering delayed valve closure, increased the early systolic regurgitant volume before complete coaptation, and decreased the duration of coaptation. Annular dilatation increased regurgitation for any papillary muscle position, creating clinically important regurgitation; conversely, increased transmitral pressure decreased regurgitant orifice area for any geometric configuration. Conclusions The clinically observed tented-leaflet configuration and dynamic regurgitant orifice area variation can be reproduced in vitro by altering the three-dimensional relationship of the annular and papillary muscle attachments of the valve so as to increase leaflet tension. Increased transmitral pressure acting to close the leaflets decreases the regurgitant orifice area. These results are consistent with a mechanism in which an altered balance of tethering versus coapting forces acting on the leaflets creates the regurgitant orifice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1826

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
He, S., Fontaine, A. A., Schwammenthal, E., Yoganathan, A. P., & Levine, R. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-09-16
Volume
96
Issue
6
Pages
1826-1834
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2614960675
Cited by
396
References
0
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Mechanism for Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Leaflet Restriction Versus Coapting Force: In Vitro Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1826
The paper
He, S., Fontaine, A. A., Schwammenthal, E., Yoganathan, A. P., & Levine, R. A. (1997). Integrated Mechanism for Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Leaflet Restriction Versus Coapting Force: In Vitro Studies. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1826

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.