Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predictive Power of the Relative Lymphocyte Concentration in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure

Open access
Ommen, Steve R., Hodge, David O., Rodeheffer, Richard J., McGregor, Christopher G. A., Thomson, Stephen P., Gibbons, Raymond J.·1998·Circulation

Abstract

Background —The physiological stress suffered by patients with heart failure results in an increased production of cortisol and a shift in the leukocyte differential toward a decreased percentage of lymphocytes (%L). The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of a low %L in advanced heart failure. Methods and Results —Patients evaluated in our cardiac transplantation clinic between April 1988 and July 1995 were retrospectively reviewed (n=263). Fifty-two patients were excluded because they had recent trauma, infection, surgery, myocardial infarction, corticosteroid use, or history of malignancy. In the remaining 211 patients, we used Cox proportional hazards analysis to examine the association between survival and transplant-free survival with baseline variables. Univariate analysis showed a significant association between time to death and %L ( P =.004), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ( P =.002), and maximal oxygen uptake ( P =.05). Univariate analysis of the end point of survival free from transplantation yielded similar results. One- and 4-year survival rates for patients with a low %L (<20.3%) were 78% and 34% compared with 90% and 73% for those with a normal %L. Multivariate analysis showed NYHA class ( P <.008) and %L ( P <.01) were independent predictors of survival and survival free from cardiac transplantation. Conclusions The relative lymphocyte concentration is an inexpensive, readily available, simple prognostic marker in patients with symptomatic heart failure who do not have recent trauma, infection, surgery, myocardial infarction, corticosteroid use, or history of malignancy. It could be incorporated into clinical models to predict patient outcome and to aid in the selection of patients for cardiac transplantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.97.1.19

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Ommen, S. R., Hodge, D. O., Rodeheffer, R. J., McGregor, C. G. A., Thomson, S. P., & Gibbons, R. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1998-01-13
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
19-22
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2136486827
Cited by
245
References
0
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive Power of the Relative Lymphocyte Concentration in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.97.1.19
The paper
Ommen, S. R., Hodge, D. O., Rodeheffer, R. J., McGregor, C. G. A., Thomson, S. P., & Gibbons, R. J. (1998). Predictive Power of the Relative Lymphocyte Concentration in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.1.19

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.