The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Open accessAbstract
Abstract —Thrombolytic therapy has been a major advance in the management of acute myocardial infarction. Unfortunately, it continues to be underused or is administered later than is optimal. Thrombolytic therapy works by lysing infarct artery thrombi and achieving reperfusion, thereby reducing infarct size, preserving left ventricular function, and improving survival. The most effective thrombolytic regimens achieve angiographic epicardial infarct-artery patency in only ≈50% of patients within 90 minutes. Bleeding requiring transfusion occurs in ≈5% of patients and stroke in ≈1.8% with these regimens, which include adjunctive aspirin and intravenous heparin. There are several ways in which reperfusion rates and thus patient outcomes might be improved, such as different dosing regimens of established agents; combinations of different agents; improved adjunctive therapy such as direct antithrombin agents, low-molecular-weight heparin, or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists; or the development of novel thrombolytic agents with enhanced fibrin specificity, resistance to native inhibitors, or prolonged half-lives allowing bolus administration. All of these strategies are being tested in clinical trials. The best approach currently is to administer thrombolytic therapy as soon as possible to all patients without contraindications who present within 12 hours of symptom onset and have ST-segment elevation on the ECG or new-onset left bundle-branch block, unless an alternative reperfusion strategy is planned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pfeffer, M. A., Braunwald, E., Moyé, L. A., Basta, L., Brown, E. J., Cuddy, T. E., Davis, B. R., Geltman, E. M., Goldman, S., Flaker, G. C., et al. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199209033271001 · Cited by 5,911
Cited by
The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction
Widlansky, M. E., Gokce, N., Keaney, J. F., & Vita, J. A. (2003) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00994-x · Cited by 1,749
Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation
VandeWerf, F. (2003) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00618-8 · Cited by 1,448
Self-citationNanotheranostics for personalized medicine
Mura, S., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.006 · Cited by 527
Thiemann, D. R., Coresh, J., Oetgen, W. J., & Powe, N. R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199905273402106 · Cited by 373
MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION
Werf, F. V. D., Ardissino, D., Betriu, A., Cokkinos, D., Falk, E., Fox, K., Julian, D., Lengyel, M., Neumann, F. J., Ruzyllo, W., et al. (2005) · Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology · doi:10.20996/1819-6446-2005-1-2-62-95 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- White, H. D., & Van de Werf, F. J. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1998-04-28
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1632-1646
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2019102755
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.97.16.1632
- The paper
- White, H. D., & Van de Werf, F. J. J. (1998). Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.16.1632
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.