Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Obesity and Risk of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Open access
Birkmeyer, Nancy J. O., Charlesworth, David C., Hernandez, Felix, Leavitt, Bruce J., Marrin, Charles A. S., Morton, Jeremy R., Olmstead, Elaine M., O’Connor, Gerald T.·1998·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Obesity is frequently cited as a risk factor for adverse outcomes of major surgery. The results of prior studies of the relationship between obesity and risk of adverse outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been contradictory because of insufficient power to assess relatively infrequent outcomes or data to adjust for confounding factors. Methods and Results —Data on patient age, sex, height, weight, medical history, current clinical status, and treatment factors were assessed prospectively among 11 101 consecutive patients undergoing CABG. Body mass index (BMI) was used as the measure of obesity and was categorized as nonobese (1st to 74th percentiles), obese (75th to 94th percentiles), or severely obese (95th to 100th percentiles). Adverse outcomes occurring in-hospital, including mortality, intraoperative/postoperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA), postoperative bleeding, and sternal wound infection, were defined prospectively. Associations between obesity and postoperative outcomes were assessed by use of logistic regression to adjust for potentially confounding variables. Although obesity was not associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.16; P =.261) or postoperative CVA (adjusted OR, 1.06; P =.765), risks of sternal wound infection were substantially increased in the obese (adjusted OR, 2.10; confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 3.06; P <.001) and severely obese (adjusted OR, 2.74; CI, 1.49 to 5.02; P =.001). On the other hand, rates of postoperative bleeding were significantly lower in the obese (adjusted OR, 0.66; CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P =.009) and severely obese (adjusted OR, 0.40; CI, 0.20 to 0.81; P =.011). Conclusions —With the exception of sternal wound infection, the perception among clinicians that obesity predisposes to various postoperative complications with CABG is not supported by these data. Further work is needed to understand the apparent protective effect of obesity on risks of postoperative bleeding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.97.17.1689

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Birkmeyer, N. J. O., Charlesworth, D. C., Hernandez, F., Leavitt, B. J., Marrin, C. A. S., Morton, J. R., Olmstead, E. M., & O’Connor, G. T.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1998-05-05
Volume
97
Issue
17
Pages
1689-1694
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2069677966
Cited by
246
References
0
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obesity and Risk of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.97.17.1689
The paper
Birkmeyer, N. J. O., Charlesworth, D. C., Hernandez, F., Leavitt, B. J., Marrin, C. A. S., Morton, J. R., Olmstead, E. M., & O’Connor, G. T. (1998). Obesity and Risk of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.17.1689

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.