The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Better Outcome for Women Compared With Men Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: A Report From the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI)
Abstract
Background —Numerous studies have shown that women undergoing coronary revascularization procedures do so at a higher risk for an adverse outcome compared with men. However, the impact of advances in technology and improvements in techniques on in-hospital and long-term outcome after revascularization in women is unclear. Methods and Results —We evaluated 1829 patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease randomized to CABG or PTCA in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI), of whom 27% were women. As expected, women were older (64.0 versus 60.5 years), with more congestive heart failure (14% versus 7%), hypertension (68% versus 42%), treated diabetes mellitus (31% versus 15%), and unstable angina (67% versus 61%) than men but had similar preservation of left ventricular function and extent of multivessel disease. Women assigned to surgery received the same number of total grafts but fewer internal mammary artery grafts (72% versus 85%, P <0.01), and those assigned to angioplasty had more intended lesions (76% versus 71%, P <0.01) successfully dilated than men. At an average of 5.4 years’ follow-up, crude mortality rates were similar in women (12.8%) and men (12.0%). The Cox regression model adjusting for baseline differences revealed that women had a significantly lower risk of death (relative risk, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84; P =0.003) but not a significantly lower risk of death plus myocardial infarction (relative risk, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.07; P =0.16) than men. Conclusions —Although the unadjusted mortality rate suggests that women and men undergoing CABG and PTCA have a similar 5-year mortality, women have higher risk profiles; consequently, contrary to previous reports, female sex is an independent predictor of improved 5-year survival after we control for multiple risk factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Cited by
2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease
Task Force Members, Montalescot, G., Sechtem, U., Achenbach, S., Andreotti, F., Arden, C., Budaj, A., Bugiardini, R., Crea, F., Cuisset, T., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296 · Cited by 4,510
Graham (2007) · doi:10.1097/01.hjr.0000277983.23934.c9 · Cited by 1,647
Subgroup analyses in therapeutic cardiovascular clinical trials: Are most of them misleading?
Hernández, A. V., Boersma, E., Murray, G. D., Habbema, J. D. F., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2006) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.020 · Cited by 131
Cardiovascular Disease in Women
Stock, E. O., & Redberg, R. (2012) · Current Problems in Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2012.07.001 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobs, A. K., Kelsey, S. F., Brooks, M. M., Faxon, D. P., Chaitman, B. R., Bittner, V., Mock, M. B., Weiner, B. H., Dean, L., Winston, C., Drew, L., & Sopko, G.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1998-09-29
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1279-1285
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2128913478
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Better Outcome for Women Compared With Men Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: A Report From the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.98.13.1279
- The paper
- Jacobs, A. K., Kelsey, S. F., Brooks, M. M., Faxon, D. P., Chaitman, B. R., Bittner, V., Mock, M. B., Weiner, B. H., Dean, L., Winston, C., Drew, L., & Sopko, G. (1998). Better Outcome for Women Compared With Men Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: A Report From the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.98.13.1279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.